2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-copy nuclear DNA, phylogeny and the evolution of dichogamy in the betel nut palms and their relatives (Arecinae; Arecaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A further species from the highlands of Papua, Hydriastele rheophytica, was added to this group by Dowe & Ferrero (2000). Subsequently, the molecular phylogenetic analysis of Loo et al (2006) led to a substantial expansion of the generic limits of Hydriastele. Their study revealed that Hydriastele sensu Burret (1937) is monophyletic, but embedded within a larger paraphyletic group of three closely related genera, Gronophyllum Scheff., Gulubia Becc.…”
Section: Taxonomic History and Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A further species from the highlands of Papua, Hydriastele rheophytica, was added to this group by Dowe & Ferrero (2000). Subsequently, the molecular phylogenetic analysis of Loo et al (2006) led to a substantial expansion of the generic limits of Hydriastele. Their study revealed that Hydriastele sensu Burret (1937) is monophyletic, but embedded within a larger paraphyletic group of three closely related genera, Gronophyllum Scheff., Gulubia Becc.…”
Section: Taxonomic History and Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NOTES. Hydriastele apetiolata is known from three collections, all of which were sequenced for two genes by Loo et al (2006) along with other specimens belonging to the Hydriastele wendlandiana group. In the resulting phylogenetic trees, H. apetiolata is distinguished by consistently falling outside of a wellsupported clade containing all other members of the group that were included in the study.…”
Section: Revised Taxonomy and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations