2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-cost 3D-printed anthropomorphic cardiac phantom, for computed tomography automatic left ventricle segmentation and volumetry – A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards the accuracy of the delineation of the tissues with respect to the reference of the printed model, the results estimated through the Dice coefficient, although highly reproducible, remain on average low. Compared with the literature presented in the introduction, only one other study made a comparison between the segmentation of the printing plate and that of the phantom result, obtaining a Dice coefficient of 0.87 for the target region of cardiac left ventricle ( 22 ), comparable with the result obtained for the lung region, but not for the others, following our approach. This result may be mainly due to the inevitable constructive limitations of the phantom; in fact, the higher the number of different fabrics to be printed, the greater the overlap between the relative printing HUs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…As regards the accuracy of the delineation of the tissues with respect to the reference of the printed model, the results estimated through the Dice coefficient, although highly reproducible, remain on average low. Compared with the literature presented in the introduction, only one other study made a comparison between the segmentation of the printing plate and that of the phantom result, obtaining a Dice coefficient of 0.87 for the target region of cardiac left ventricle ( 22 ), comparable with the result obtained for the lung region, but not for the others, following our approach. This result may be mainly due to the inevitable constructive limitations of the phantom; in fact, the higher the number of different fabrics to be printed, the greater the overlap between the relative printing HUs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…We used an anatomically and radiologically accurate 3D-printed heart phantom with contrast-filled left heart chambers. The production and validation of using the phantom for automated LVEF measurements was described in a previous paper [16]. This phantom was placed inside an anthropomorphic chest phantom (LungMan N1, Kyoto Kagaku, Kyoto, Japan), and a series of scans were performed on a Siemens Somatom FORCE CT scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany).…”
Section: Optimisation Of Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%