2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11174536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Cost Archaeological Investigation and Rapid Mapping of Ancient Stone Tidal Weirs in the Penghu Archipelago Using Google Earth

Abstract: This paper provides a brief history review of the use of ancient weirs in fishing on our planet, as well as a pilot study that involves investigating and mapping the coastal heritage of ancient stone tidal weirs (STWs) in the Penghu Archipelago which is located in the Taiwan Strait. The spatial distribution and morphological features of STWs across Penghu Archipelago were investigated and analyzed using very high-resolution (VHR) and freely available Google Earth (GE) imagery and geographic information system … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The World Database on Protected Areas 53 was loaded into a geographic information system to identify missing polygons for Ramsar and Natural World Heritage Sites. Maps of sites were overlaid onto Google Earth using the image overlay function [54][55][56] , allowing delineation of each site's boundaries. When sites were not identifiable, due to either land cover or missing/ inaccurate information, we used historical imagery and/or published literature to delineate the site accurately 57,58 .…”
Section: Heritage Sites Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The World Database on Protected Areas 53 was loaded into a geographic information system to identify missing polygons for Ramsar and Natural World Heritage Sites. Maps of sites were overlaid onto Google Earth using the image overlay function [54][55][56] , allowing delineation of each site's boundaries. When sites were not identifiable, due to either land cover or missing/ inaccurate information, we used historical imagery and/or published literature to delineate the site accurately 57,58 .…”
Section: Heritage Sites Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) 48 was loaded into a GIS and was used to identify missing polygons for Ramsar and Natural World Heritage Sites. Maps of sites were overlaid onto Google Earth using the image overlay function [49][50][51] , allowing delineation of each site's boundaries. In the case of sites which were not identi able, due to either landcover, or missing/inaccurate information, historical imagery and/or published literature were used to delineate the site accurately 52,53 .…”
Section: Heritage Sites De Nitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular software is Google Earth (GE), which was launched in 2005 and still is a simple tool for studying archaeological heritages using multiresolution imagery (Guo, 2017; Yu & Gong, 2012). Numerous research articles have been published based on virtual globes by using GE or using only GE in combination with ground‐based techniques (Luo et al, 2019; Myers, 2010; Parcak, Mumford, & Childs, 2017). Archaeological sites are complicated for direct interpretation based on only a surface view, particularly at destroyed sites such as Al‐Khuribah, because they generally comprise different architectural elements that extend into the subsurface.…”
Section: Aerial Images and Their Significancementioning
confidence: 99%