2018
DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2018.63036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Cost Filtration of Domestic Wastewater for Irrigation Purpose

Abstract: Water scarcity in developing countries has forced farmers to use sewage as an alternative source of irrigation water. However, the usage of sewage for vegetable production has been known to cause excessive and often-unbalanced addition of nutrients hence posing a threat to food safety. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of slow sand filter and wetland plant in domestic wastewater treatment. To achieve this objective, samples were collected from the domestic wastewater collection pond wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, treating dye-containing wastewater before being discharged into water bodies is becoming more crucial than ever [5]. Numerous treatment methods have been deployed, including (a) physical methods, such as physical sorption, ion exchange, and membrane filtration [6][7][8], (b) chemical methods, such as redox treatment, precipitation, and photocatalysis [9], and (c) biological methods, such as aerobic/anaerobic treatment [5,10]. Among 2 of 22 these treatment methods, adsorption is particularly considered one of the most attractive methods due to its high efficiency, simplicity, low cost, low energy consumption, and recyclable nature [6,[11][12][13][14] Through extensive research, various materials [15,16] have been studied as dye-removal adsorbents, including activated carbons [17], biochar [18,19], zeolites, alumina, silica gel, graphene oxide [20], natural materials (wood, coal, chitin/chitosan, clay), industrial/agricultural/domestic wastes, and nanomaterials [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, treating dye-containing wastewater before being discharged into water bodies is becoming more crucial than ever [5]. Numerous treatment methods have been deployed, including (a) physical methods, such as physical sorption, ion exchange, and membrane filtration [6][7][8], (b) chemical methods, such as redox treatment, precipitation, and photocatalysis [9], and (c) biological methods, such as aerobic/anaerobic treatment [5,10]. Among 2 of 22 these treatment methods, adsorption is particularly considered one of the most attractive methods due to its high efficiency, simplicity, low cost, low energy consumption, and recyclable nature [6,[11][12][13][14] Through extensive research, various materials [15,16] have been studied as dye-removal adsorbents, including activated carbons [17], biochar [18,19], zeolites, alumina, silica gel, graphene oxide [20], natural materials (wood, coal, chitin/chitosan, clay), industrial/agricultural/domestic wastes, and nanomaterials [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing countries, particularly in urban and periurban areas, greywater is frequently discharged untreated into street drains or onto open ground, primarily ending up in rivers, resulting in oxygen depletion, eutrophication, and microbial and chemical contamination of soil and aquatic systems [ 2 , 9 , 10 ]. In the absence of treatment, this greywater contributes an excessive and frequently unwanted amount of chemicals and pathogenic microorganisms, endangering the environment, food safety, and human health [ 11 – 13 ]. Each year, at least 1.8 million children under the age of five die due to water-related diseases, accounting for roughly 17% of all deaths in this age group [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%