Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_1084-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Cost Sensors for Indoor and Outdoor Pollution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could improve the calculation of T mrt using the black globe thermometer and the calculation of PET, notably when airing a room or during v below the threshold of the cup anemometer at semi-outdoor locations. Another interesting addition would be a low-cost air quality or CO 2 sensor to inform workers about the need to vent indoor air [67,68]. Because the enclosure of the MoBiMet is not waterproof, determination of human thermal comfort is only possible at indoor and semi-outdoor workplaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could improve the calculation of T mrt using the black globe thermometer and the calculation of PET, notably when airing a room or during v below the threshold of the cup anemometer at semi-outdoor locations. Another interesting addition would be a low-cost air quality or CO 2 sensor to inform workers about the need to vent indoor air [67,68]. Because the enclosure of the MoBiMet is not waterproof, determination of human thermal comfort is only possible at indoor and semi-outdoor workplaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For NO 2 measurements, the NO2B43F sensor [37] is used. This is an amperometric electrochemical gas sensor containing four electrodes, where the working principle is based on electrochemistry [19]. The target gas enters the working electrode by diffusion, where it is chemically reduced, resulting in a current signal.…”
Section: Description Of the Sensor Node Agomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is significant interest in using low-cost sensors to characterize personal exposure by measuring pollution concentrations in micro-environments in which people spend time, such as the workplace, at home and in various means of transport used during commuting [19]. Combining the different pollution sensors into a node (with signal processing and communication, as well as data storage and analysis) forms a useful tool to assess air quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-cost sensors (LCS) have the potential to revolutionise air quality monitoring. There is no agreed definition of a low-cost sensor, however, they are far cheaper, smaller and record with greater time-resolution than traditional methods [ 12 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. This means that they can be deployed in greater numbers, used in mobile applications, and in areas where monitoring is not currently possible, all with high time-resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, together with the many benefits LCS have over traditional methods, they also have outstanding issues with data quality. In particular, LCS suffer from issues with selectivity, sensitivity, and stability, all of which detract from their overall accuracy [ 12 , 17 , 22 , 23 ]. These issues are typical to all LCS but also depend on the sensor’s principle of operation, and the context they are used in.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%