2017
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Dose Aspirin and Pancreatic Cancer Risk—Reply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metaregression of this association over time shows a significant decreasing trend in the RR, with an average decrease of 1.9% per year (95% CI, 0.9%-2.8%; P ¼ .00012). 3 Summarizing all 21 studies in this way, a current estimate of the RR of pancreatic cancer for regular use of aspirin is 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62-0.78). 3 All of the cohort studies in the metaregression were conducted such that their case accessions occurred on average during approximately the first one-half of the overall time frame of the accessions (1976-2011), whereas the RRs have been appreciably declining since the midpoint.…”
Section: Dear Editorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metaregression of this association over time shows a significant decreasing trend in the RR, with an average decrease of 1.9% per year (95% CI, 0.9%-2.8%; P ¼ .00012). 3 Summarizing all 21 studies in this way, a current estimate of the RR of pancreatic cancer for regular use of aspirin is 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62-0.78). 3 All of the cohort studies in the metaregression were conducted such that their case accessions occurred on average during approximately the first one-half of the overall time frame of the accessions (1976-2011), whereas the RRs have been appreciably declining since the midpoint.…”
Section: Dear Editorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Summarizing all 21 studies in this way, a current estimate of the RR of pancreatic cancer for regular use of aspirin is 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62-0.78). 3 All of the cohort studies in the metaregression were conducted such that their case accessions occurred on average during approximately the first one-half of the overall time frame of the accessions (1976-2011), whereas the RRs have been appreciably declining since the midpoint. Both the case control and cohort studies included here have strengths and weaknesses, but both types convey relevant data on the association.…”
Section: Dear Editorsmentioning
confidence: 99%