2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Dose Aspirin Is Safe and Effective for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subjects of this study are elderly patients 50 years and older. The elasticity of blood vessels are poor and elder patients are complicated by the physiological or organic changes of multiple organs, and the perioperative period of lower extremity joint mobility and the amount of activity are significantly reduced, so the risk of DVT is higher[ 24 26 ]. We have found that age > 70y, BMI ≥ 28, diabetes, bilateral joint replacements, duration of surgery ≥ 120 min, cemented prosthesis, and duration of days in bed > 3 days were the independent risk factors of DVT of lower limb in patients with THA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects of this study are elderly patients 50 years and older. The elasticity of blood vessels are poor and elder patients are complicated by the physiological or organic changes of multiple organs, and the perioperative period of lower extremity joint mobility and the amount of activity are significantly reduced, so the risk of DVT is higher[ 24 26 ]. We have found that age > 70y, BMI ≥ 28, diabetes, bilateral joint replacements, duration of surgery ≥ 120 min, cemented prosthesis, and duration of days in bed > 3 days were the independent risk factors of DVT of lower limb in patients with THA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three retrospective studies within the past two years have cited low-dose ASA as a suitable chemoprophylactic agent in revision arthroplasty 391-393 . Tang et al, compared a prophylaxis protocol of 81 mg of ASA twice a day ( bis in die [bid]) compared to 325 mg ASA bid in 1,361 revision THA patients and found no difference in total VTE, bleeding, or any other complication between the two groups 391 . A similar retrospective study was conducted for patients undergoing revision TKA and also observed no significant difference between low- and high-dose ASA for total VTE, bleeding, or any other complications 392 .…”
Section: - Should the Methods For Vte Prophylaxis Be Altered In Patie...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been a trend towards using a lower dose ASA for VTE prophylaxis in revision arthroplasty compared to the traditional higher doses used in earlier regimens. Three retrospective studies within the past two years have cited low-dose ASA as a suitable chemoprophylactic agent in revision arthroplasty 391-393 . Tang et al, compared a prophylaxis protocol of 81 mg of ASA twice a day ( bis in die [bid]) compared to 325 mg ASA bid in 1,361 revision THA patients and found no difference in total VTE, bleeding, or any other complication between the two groups 391 .…”
Section: - Should the Methods For Vte Prophylaxis Be Altered In Patie...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22]27 Other studies have shown the efficacy of low-dose (81 mg) ASA alone for VTE prophylaxis. [10][11][12][13][14][15]18 However, few studies have investigated if a regimen including outpatient use of mobile IPCDs with ASA provides more effective prophylaxis than ASA alone. Currently, only one randomized control trial (RCT) study has been published that found superior reduction in VTE incidence in standard-risk patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on 325-mg ASA BID who were discharged with outpatient portable IPCDs compared with patients with inpatient only IPCDs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,9 While there is no optimal chemoprophylaxis regimen established, low-dose oral aspirin administered twice daily (81-mg ASA BID) has been shown to be a safe and low-cost option with similar efficacy to other anticoagulation medications such as 325-mg ASA BID, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin, and factor X a inhibitors. [10][11][12][13][14][15] Selecting a safe pharmacologic agent becomes especially important when considering postoperative complications associated with these medications which include gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, wound complications, superficial and deep infection, and mortality. [16][17][18] Mechanical prophylaxis alone has been shown to reduce VTE rates, with a lower rate of bleeding complications after THA when compared with anticoagulation therapy alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%