2018
DOI: 10.1177/0284185118770919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dose CT of postoperative pelvic fractures: a comparison with radiography

Abstract: LDCT is more reliable than CR in assessing hardware position and fracture reduction. Joint congruency is sometimes not possible to assess with CR, due to overlapping hardware. The image quality is higher, but also the effective dose, with LDCT than with CR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated median effective radiation dose for the low-dose protocol in our study (0.4-0.5 mSv) was in the lower range compared to other studies using low-dose CT of the pelvis (0.2-2.3 mSv) [4,9,10]. Our values can be compared to effective radiation doses of between 0.3 and 0.4 mSv for CR of the pelvis with 3-5 projections in recently reported data [4,23]. Attaining correct and comparable projections of the pelvis with CR can be challenging, and incorrect projections might demand repeated radiography in 6-20% of cases, resulting in higher radiation doses and patient inconvenience [21].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The calculated median effective radiation dose for the low-dose protocol in our study (0.4-0.5 mSv) was in the lower range compared to other studies using low-dose CT of the pelvis (0.2-2.3 mSv) [4,9,10]. Our values can be compared to effective radiation doses of between 0.3 and 0.4 mSv for CR of the pelvis with 3-5 projections in recently reported data [4,23]. Attaining correct and comparable projections of the pelvis with CR can be challenging, and incorrect projections might demand repeated radiography in 6-20% of cases, resulting in higher radiation doses and patient inconvenience [21].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Examinations with particularly low-dose (LD) have become established in many areas, for example, in pulmonary 4,5 or paranasal sinus imaging, 6,7 but also in uroradiology. 8,9 In musculoskeletal (MSK) radiology, there are various studies dealing with the reduction of radiation dose in CT, [10][11][12][13][14] but clinical use has so far been limited. For example, fracture detection improved in LD CT images with the same 10 or only 2.5-fold 11 higher-dose exposure than in radiographs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 In musculoskeletal (MSK) radiology, there are various studies dealing with the reduction of radiation dose in CT, [10][11][12][13][14] but clinical use has so far been limited. For example, fracture detection improved in LD CT images with the same 10 or only 2.5-fold 11 higher-dose exposure than in radiographs. In addition, dose reductions of 48% 14 to 93% 13 have been reported for LD CT images compared with standard-dose CT images for detecting lumbar spine and limb fractures, respectively, without a substantial loss in diagnostic image quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT diagnosis of all aspects of musculoskeletal diseases would increase dramatically over the following decades, and CT is today a workhorse of all musculoskeletal imaging. Low-dose musculoskeletal CT, achieving an effective dose comparable to that of conventional radiography of the same organ, has been reported in several papers for lumbar spine imaging (99-101) and the pelvis and hip (102,103) between 2014 and 2019.…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 98%