2013
DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dose CT scan screening for lung cancer: comparison of images and radiation doses between low-dose CT and follow-up standard diagnostic CT

Abstract: ObjectivesThis study aim to compare image quality and radiation doses between low-dose CT and follow-up standard diagnostic CT for lung cancer screening.MethodsIn a single medical institution, 19 subjects who had been screened for lung cancer by low-dose CT before going through follow-up standard diagnostic CT were randomly selected. Both CT image sets for all subjects were independently evaluated by five specialized physicians.ResultsThere were no significant differences between low-dose CT screening and foll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The dose levels range between 20 and 400 mSv for CBCT and around 1000 mSv for multidetector row CT modalities, which is about 10-50 times more than a conventional panoramic radiograph (about 20 mSv). 13,14 Even though device manufacturers have been developing "ultra" low-dose CT scanning protocols, [15][16][17] any X-ray-based imaging technology inevitably results in some radiation exposure. Therefore, an alternative, radiation-free imaging modality is still being sought, especially in applications that require a large number of follow-up scans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dose levels range between 20 and 400 mSv for CBCT and around 1000 mSv for multidetector row CT modalities, which is about 10-50 times more than a conventional panoramic radiograph (about 20 mSv). 13,14 Even though device manufacturers have been developing "ultra" low-dose CT scanning protocols, [15][16][17] any X-ray-based imaging technology inevitably results in some radiation exposure. Therefore, an alternative, radiation-free imaging modality is still being sought, especially in applications that require a large number of follow-up scans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce concerns regarding the ionizing radiation induced by PET/CT, one may consider reducing the radiation exposure of PET/CT scans. There are studies that show that low-dose CT scans have similar tissue HU levels as those in routine CT scans with no diagnostic differences noted, suggesting the use of low(er) dose CT scans in routine examinations [45]. On the other hand, lowering radiation dose in PET equipment is more difficult and expensive than its CT counterpart [46], [47].…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 10 point likert scale was used for all scoring to characterize the 133 target nodule images according to the criteria of malignancy described in [39, 40]. Each of the 133 nodule images has 7 scores:…”
Section: Tissue-specific Mrf Clinical Performance In Nodule Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%