1995
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v86.3.983.bloodjournal863983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dose immune tolerance induction in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors

Abstract: In patients with hemophilia A and inhibitory alloantibodies against factor VIII, various dosage schedules are used to obtain immune tolerance. In this study, we have evaluated the results of 13 years of low-dose immune tolerance induction and factors that are predictive of a positive result. The effect of immune tolerance induction in relation to age at inhibitor development, number of exposure days, age at start of therapy, maximum inhibitor titer, factor VIII products involved, and virologic status were dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
170
0
10

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
170
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasma samples were analysed using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda method (Verbruggen et al, 1995). Samples measured before 1996 were analysed using the standard Bethesda assay (Kasper et al, 1975;Mauser-Bunschoten et al, 1995).…”
Section: Bethesda Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma samples were analysed using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda method (Verbruggen et al, 1995). Samples measured before 1996 were analysed using the standard Bethesda assay (Kasper et al, 1975;Mauser-Bunschoten et al, 1995).…”
Section: Bethesda Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is difficult to compare results obtained in clinical studies using different protocols. The most commonly used protocols, summarised in Table I, are known as the Bonn (Brackmann et al, 1996), the Van Creveld (Mauser-Bunschoten et al, 1995) and the Malmö (Nilsson et al, 1988;Berntorp et al, 2000) protocols. Despite their considerable differences, the success rates of all three protocols seem to be comparable.…”
Section: Immune Tolerance Induction Therapy In Patients With Fviii Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Van Creveld protocol uses a low-dose protocol (Mauser-Bunschoten et al, 1995). Initially, patients receive a 'neutralising dose' of 25-50 U/kg FVIII twice a day for 1-2 weeks.…”
Section: Immune Tolerance Induction Therapy In Patients With Fviii Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor risk patients 100-200 iu/kg/d probably more effective Good risk patients No difference between 200 iu/kg/d and 50 iu/kg 3 times a week but tolerance achieved more rapidly with higher dose regimens and with less intercurrent bleeds Mariani et al (1994) Kroner (1999), Mauser-Bunschoten et al (1995), Brackmann et al (1996), DiMichele and Kroner (2002) DiMichele ( • All patients who require replacement therapy with concentrate, including previously untreated patients, should be treated with recombinant FVIII/IX (Grade 1C).…”
Section: Risk Effect Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The I-ITI and NAITI suggest that poor-risk patients (peak titre >200 BU/ml, starting titre >10 BU/ml) are best tolerized using a high-dose regimen (100-200 iu/kg/d FVIII) (Mariani et al, 1994;DiMichele & Kroner, 2002). These registries and the I-ITI study suggest that high dose and lowdose (50 iu/kg three times weekly) regimens are equally effective in inducing tolerance in good risk patients (Mariani et al, 1994;Mauser-Bunschoten et al, 1995;DiMichele & Kroner, 2002;Hay & DiMichele, 2012). By implication, therefore, 200 and 100 iu/kg/d can be assumed to be equally efficacious for inducing tolerance in good risk patients (Hay & DiMichele, 2012) but the relative effect of these high dose regimens on bleeding is unknown.…”
Section: Inhibitor Eradicationmentioning
confidence: 99%