2012
DOI: 10.1177/1010539512466568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Dose Risk Assessment for Arsenic

Abstract: We conducted a meta-analysis to explore dose-response relationships for bladder and lung cancers when people are chronically exposed to low doses of arsenic. We searched electronic databases for articles published through 2010. Ten studies on bladder cancer and ingested arsenic exposure and five studies on lung cancer and ingested arsenic exposure fit our selection criteria. We also investigate the sensitivity of the absolute risk of lung and bladder cancer under different underlying prevalence measures. Males… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a consistent association between arsenic and lung cancer. Recently, a cohort analysis in another non-endemic country observed effects similar to ours [ 42 ], while a previous low-dose meta-analysis found borderline significant effects for this cancer type [ 4 , 6 ]. This finding, considering its biological plausibility, is coherent with IARC evaluation regarding the carcinogenic role of arsenic on lung cancer [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We found a consistent association between arsenic and lung cancer. Recently, a cohort analysis in another non-endemic country observed effects similar to ours [ 42 ], while a previous low-dose meta-analysis found borderline significant effects for this cancer type [ 4 , 6 ]. This finding, considering its biological plausibility, is coherent with IARC evaluation regarding the carcinogenic role of arsenic on lung cancer [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Table 3 displays the total number of samples for each element that had a reported value that exceeded, approached, was below the guidelines, or below detection (BD) by the method used (see Supplementary Materials). A sample was “approaching” a limit if its concentration was within 75% of the reported regulatory limit or national average, which has been suggested as a precautionary guideline to monitor water resources [59,60,61,62,63,64].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, these guidelines, as with primary standards, are a metric for which to compare the drinking water concentrations. Furthermore, arguments question if the current guidelines used to create enforceable regulatory limits on drinking water are insufficient, especially given research that opposes the previous dogma and supports observable health consequences to exposed populations [59,86].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous epidemiological studies indicate an association between arsenic exposure and an increased risk for lung cancer mortality (1, 1720), and lung cancer may be the leading cause of arsenic-associated cancer deaths. Meta-analysis of available epidemiological studies performed in Bangladesh, Chile, Argentina, Taiwan and the United States (21), estimated about 4.51 additional lung cancer cases per 100,000 people for a maximum contamination level of 10ug/ l of arsenic in drinking water. An association between arsenic exposure and bladder cancer has been substantiated by multiple ecological, as well as case-control and cohort studies (reviewed in (1, 17,18, 22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%