2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01517-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy: Quality of life improvement and clinical impact of maintenance and adjuvant treatment in patients with mycosis fungoides or Sezary syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies indicate that maintenance therapy after TSEBT may improve the PFS (Elsayad et al 2020b;Heumann et al 2015;Jennings et al 2019). Low-dose focal radiotherapy combined with romidepsin therapy seems to be safe and reasonable option in patients with symptomatic lesions (Akilov et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies indicate that maintenance therapy after TSEBT may improve the PFS (Elsayad et al 2020b;Heumann et al 2015;Jennings et al 2019). Low-dose focal radiotherapy combined with romidepsin therapy seems to be safe and reasonable option in patients with symptomatic lesions (Akilov et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) in the range of 10-12 Gy over 3 weeks is a current treatment option for cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) with excellent response rate and minimal risk of adverse events (Elsayad et al 2017;Kroeger et al 2017;Mehta-Shah et al 2020). Prior studies show that low-dose TSEBT could improve disease symptoms, tumor burden, and patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) in CTCL (Elsayad et al 2020b;Hoppe et al 2015). TSEBT can be combined with systemic therapy to improve PFS (Elsayad et al 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequent and salient patient concerns identified from the current interviews were then examined for their presence in a selection of QoL instruments, including the SF‐36, HUI3, DLQI, Skindex‐29 and MF/SS‐CTCL QoL 15,17,19,29,30 . The SF‐36 is the most widely used QoL measure in research to date; the HUI3 provides additional insight into the economic impact of varying degrees of QoL impairment; the DLQI is the most widely used QoL instrument in dermatology; and the Skindex‐29 is often used to assess QoL among patients with cutaneous lymphoma, as it incorporates additional psychological aspects of QoL not addressed in the DLQI 16,18,25,31–33 . The final developed codebook was applied to these existing QoL instruments, with coding performed by T.S.B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,17,19,29,30 The SF-36 is the most widely used QoL measure in research to date; the HUI3 provides additional insight into the economic impact of varying degrees of QoL impairment; the DLQI is the most widely used QoL instrument in dermatology; and the Skindex-29 is often used to assess QoL among patients with cutaneous lymphoma, as it incorporates additional psychological aspects of QoL not addressed in the DLQI. 16,18,25,[31][32][33] The final developed codebook was applied to these existing QoL instruments, with coding performed by T.S.B. and code assignment confirmed by A.C.M.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Quality-of-life Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kroeger et al achieved adequate treatment results with fewer grade 2 skin toxicities with low-dose (12 Gy) TSEI compared to conventional doses [16]. Additionally, the low total dose is important in terms of the need for a second treatment and improved quality of life [17,18]. Today, for TSEI, a total dose of 12-36 Gy is often preferred as 4-6 Gy per week, and complete response rates are 90% and above some series [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%