2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low doses of dietary lead are associated with a profound reduction in the time to the onset of puberty in female mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our observations are consistent with analyses of the data of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey showing that environmental lead exposure was related to retarded pubic hair development in girls (Selevan et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2003). Studies in rats have shown an inhibiting effect of lead on pubertal development in the female (Dearth et al, 2002;Iavicoli et al, 2006;Pine et al, 2006). Possible underlying mechanisms might include the inhibition by lead of the binding of estradiol to estrogen receptor-a, observed in human cells in vitro (Martin et al, 2003), and decreased serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-1, LH and estradiol, which in turn may delay the onset or progression of puberty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, our observations are consistent with analyses of the data of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey showing that environmental lead exposure was related to retarded pubic hair development in girls (Selevan et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2003). Studies in rats have shown an inhibiting effect of lead on pubertal development in the female (Dearth et al, 2002;Iavicoli et al, 2006;Pine et al, 2006). Possible underlying mechanisms might include the inhibition by lead of the binding of estradiol to estrogen receptor-a, observed in human cells in vitro (Martin et al, 2003), and decreased serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-1, LH and estradiol, which in turn may delay the onset or progression of puberty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…While the fish kept in the ponds and exposed to lead did not show any statistically significant differences in the GSI value after 12 and after 24 months of the exposure (Table 3), Prussian carps kept in aquariums showed statistically significant differences in the values of the GSI after 12 months of the exposure (LuszczekTrojnar et al 2014). The influence of lead on the endocrinological changes in mammals (Iavicoli et al 2006) and fish (Spieler et al 1995;Rademacher et al 2003;Sloman et al 2005) was analyzed on many occasions. In the present research, after 12 months of the exposure spontaneous secretion of LH ranged from 15 ± 6.8 to 45 ± 5.4 ng/ml, and after 24 months the secretion ranged from 23 ± 5.3 to 45 ± 7.7 ng/ml.…”
Section: Monthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other observed effects of lead contamination in animals include neurological, gastrointestinal, reproductive, circulatory, immunological, histopathological, and histochemical disorders (Iavicoli et al 2006;Mobarak and Sharaf 2011;Sharma et al 2011;Steuerwald et al 2014). The negative influence of lead on organisms is observed not only in the case of the use of large doi: 10.17221/8526-CJAS doses of this metal, but also very frequently in the case of chronic exposure to its small doses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, this suggests that the EPA would consider possible harm related to an hormetic/ biphasic dose-response, but not if benefits occurred. The U.S. EPA could accept data showing a low dose hormetic stimulation leading to adverse health effects (e.g., increased prostate gland size [120] or significant acceleration in a developmental process such as the onset of puberty [133,134]). In contrast, the U.S. EPA would ignore the hormetic response when it resulted in a reduction in a population-based risk (reduction in tumor incidence).…”
Section: The Default Model In Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%