1986
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low doses of pulsed ultrasound and chromosomal abnormalities in male mouse germ cells

Abstract: Male mice were exposed to pulsed ultrasound (intensity less than 1 mW, frequency 3.5 MHz) for 30 min or to sham treatment. After 30 h, 11, 12 or 13 days, the testes were cytologically and histologically examined (using squash preparations, air-drying and sections). The resulting damage was studied at diakinesis-metaphase I and II, spermatogonial metaphase and anaphase. The investigation by air-drying did not show any significant increase in chromosome damage, 30 h, 11, 12 and 13 days after treatment (spermatog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The induction of single strand breaks was measured also by use of the single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay on cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells after exposure of cell suspensions to 2.17 MHz ultrasound Miller and Thomas, 1996). It was observed earlier that exposure to pulsed Doppler ultrasound induced sister chromatid exchanges (Barnett et al, 1987), and caused other detectable damage on the human genome (Garaj-Vrhovac and Kopjar, 1999a,b) as well as on male mouse germ cells (Moutschen et al, 1986). Ultrasound of diagnostic intensities impaired the DNA and growth patterns of animal cells (Fuciarelli et al, 1995;Liebeskind et al, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The induction of single strand breaks was measured also by use of the single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay on cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells after exposure of cell suspensions to 2.17 MHz ultrasound Miller and Thomas, 1996). It was observed earlier that exposure to pulsed Doppler ultrasound induced sister chromatid exchanges (Barnett et al, 1987), and caused other detectable damage on the human genome (Garaj-Vrhovac and Kopjar, 1999a,b) as well as on male mouse germ cells (Moutschen et al, 1986). Ultrasound of diagnostic intensities impaired the DNA and growth patterns of animal cells (Fuciarelli et al, 1995;Liebeskind et al, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been very few animal studies, but in a study of chromosomal abnormalities in mouse male germ cells, low doses of pulsed ultrasound have been shown to result in a significant increase in aneuploid cells detected a t anaphase 11, suggesting errors in meiosis (Moutschen et al, 1986). It is important to know whether the chromosomal anomalies in the human oocytes could be a consequence of ultrasound exposure, and therefore, similar studies in mice are underway in our laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La preuve en est que, récemment, le contrôle ultrasonique de la croissance folliculaire a été mis en• cause en tant que générateur de non-disjonctions chromosomiques dans les ovo cytes [25]. The analysis of the distribution of non disjunction indicates that there is a significant diffe rence between observed non-disjunction and fre quencies expected from an equal partitioning of non-disjunction among ali chromosomes, especially in the D and G groups.…”
unclassified