Low educational attainment is associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the United States adult population

Abstract

Introduction Educational attainment is an important social determinant of health (SDOH) for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the association between educational attainment and all-cause and CVD mortality has not been longitudinally evaluated on a population-level in the US, especially in individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In this nationally representative study, we assessed the association between educational attainment and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular (CVD) mortality in the general adult population and in adults with ASCVD in the US. Methods We used data from the 2006–2014 National Death Index-linked National Health Interview Survey for adults ≥ 18 years. We generated age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) by levels of educational attainment (< high school (HS), HS/General Education Development (GED), some college, and ≥ College) in the overall population and in adults with ASCVD. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the multivariable-adjusted associations between educational attainment and all-cause and CVD mortality. Results The sample comprised 210,853 participants (mean age 46.3), representing ~ 189 million adults annually, of which 8% had ASCVD. Overall, 14.7%, 27%, 20.3%, and 38% of the population had educational attainment < HS, HS/GED, Some College, and ≥ College, respectively. During a median follow-up of 4.5 years, all-cause age-adjusted mortality rates were 400.6 vs. 208.6 and 1446.7 vs. 984.0 for the total and ASCVD populations for < HS vs ≥ College education, respectively. CVD age adjusted mortality rates were 82.1 vs. 38.7 and 456.4 vs 279.5 for the total and ASCVD populations for < HS vs ≥ College education, respectively. In models adjusting for demographics and SDOH, < HS (reference = ≥ College) was associated with 40–50% increased risk of mortality in the total population and 20–40% increased risk of mortality in the ASCVD population, for both all-cause and CVD mortality. Further adjustment for traditional risk factors attenuated the associations but remained statistically significant for < HS in the overall population. Similar trends were seen across sociodemographic subgroups including age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, and insurance status. Conclusions Lower educational attainment is independently associated with increased risk of all-cause and CVD mortality in both the total and ASCVD populations, with the highest risk observed for individuals with < HS education. Future efforts to understand persistent disparities in CVD and all-cause mortality should pay close attention to the role of education, and include educational attainment as an independent predictor in mortality risk prediction algorithms.

The association between education and premature mortality in the Chinese population: a 10-year cohort study

“…Our results were similar to previous studies in Cuba, 10 US 28 and Italy. 29 Stephanie Ross et al. 10 also found that the death risk of population with the lowest education level was 1.79 times that of those with the highest education, and the effect among women was more pronounced.…”

“…found that compared with individuals not completing primary school, the cancer mortality of those complete university had a HR of 0.57 among men and 0.84 among women. Najah 29 et al. showed compared to population with college and above education, the HR of those who didn't finish high school was 2.03.…”

The Global Occurrences of Cleft Lip and Palate in Pediatric Patients and Their Association with Demographic Factors: A Narrative Review

“…Considering that educational attainment is known as one of health’s social determinants, it is important to note how previous studies have linked low educational attainment to the occurrence of diseases [ 46 , 47 ]. Regardless of the acknowledged association between educational attainment and the occurrence of orofacial clefts, the contradiction or variation between research findings does not yet allow a solid conclusion.…”

Unfavorable social determinants of health and risk of mortality in adults with diabetes: findings from the National Health Interview Survey

“… 5 Current frameworks to capture SDOH burden are either based on solitary measures of individual SDOH or indices that capture a limited number of social determinants without due attention to the interconnected nature of SDOH across established domains. 6 9 10 In addition, such indices have mostly been developed in subgroups without diabetes or in the general population, 11 and predict non-mortality endpoints. 12 To our knowledge, comprehensive SDOH indices have not been used to capture cumulative social disadvantage and assess mortality risk in adults with diabetes.…”