2020
DOI: 10.1080/10448632.2020.1819125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low energy accelerator-driven neutron facilities—A prospect for a brighter future for research with neutrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At first sight it might be surprising that the rather inefficient process of low energy nuclear reactions can produce neutron beams of such high brightness. As elaborated in [2], the main reasons are as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first sight it might be surprising that the rather inefficient process of low energy nuclear reactions can produce neutron beams of such high brightness. As elaborated in [2], the main reasons are as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional neutron provision by nuclear reactors is serving this demand but the construction and maintenance of such large-scale research facilities are increasingly costly and time consuming. Therefore, neutron beam time is progressively secured by alternative routes, in particular accelerator-driven neutron sources (ADNS) as spallation neutron sources or compact accelerator-based neutron sources (CANS) [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low energy reactions (10-100 MeV) yield much fewer neutrons per incident proton than spallation processes ( ∼ 20-30 neutrons for spallation [10]). However, this inefficiency of the individual reaction is compensated by two factors: (i) the much higher flux of incident protons for the same beam power on the target and (ii) more neutron beam extraction due to the compact target-moderator-reflector (TMR) unit [4]. Moreover, CANS benefit from fewer shielding requirements, less waste and reasonable construction costs for the building to house it in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%