Recently, ͓Oh et al. Phys. Rev. B 77, 155430 ͑2008͔͒ reported on an atomic model for the so-called Si͑557͒-reconstructed surface with regular triple steps. The atomic structure model proposed was developed on the basis of high-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy ͑STM͒ images and first-principles calculations performed to match such STM images. Here we argue that the STM image presented is affected by an artifact, most likely related to a multiple tip image effect. Among other issues with the image presented, the corner holes for ͑7 ϫ 7͒ reconstruction on Si͑111͒ terraces are not visible, since a doubled image superimposed smears out such characteristic depression. The ͑ϫ7͒ periodicity deduced for the edge facets, in contrast with previously reported STM images and electron-diffraction studies which unambiguously indicate a ͑ϫ2͒ periodicity, arises from the same artifact. Finally, we remark that the ͑557͒ surface orientation and ͑112͒ orientation of triple steps assumed for first-principles calculations disregard the latest experimental data available, which suggests this surface has a ͑7 7 10͒ orientation and the steps in triple step do not form a well-defined plane ͓Surf. Sci. 600, 4878 ͑2006͔͒.