1967
DOI: 10.1088/0370-1328/92/2/310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy electron scattering by atomic hydrogen: III. Comparison of theory and experiment for the electron-induced excitation of hydrogen to then= 2 level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Th e mos t interes tin g feature of the threshold work was th e plateau in Q.l near the threshold, which is consis te nt with a finite value of Q.l at thres hold. In addition to the agreement with theory pre viously noted [Chamberlain e t aI., 1964] th ese r es ults have been found to be in good agreem e nt with rece nt calculation s by Burke, Ormond e, and Whitaker [1966] and by Burke , Taylor, and Ormonde [1967] , as c an be seen in figure 5.…”
Section: Threshold Datasupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Th e mos t interes tin g feature of the threshold work was th e plateau in Q.l near the threshold, which is consis te nt with a finite value of Q.l at thres hold. In addition to the agreement with theory pre viously noted [Chamberlain e t aI., 1964] th ese r es ults have been found to be in good agreem e nt with rece nt calculation s by Burke, Ormond e, and Whitaker [1966] and by Burke , Taylor, and Ormonde [1967] , as c an be seen in figure 5.…”
Section: Threshold Datasupporting
confidence: 78%
“…(2) Over th e s mall electron e nergy and consequent gu n voltage ranges, there we re no significant c hanges in th e following parameters: Chamberlain, Smith and Heddle [1964], 6; by Fite,Stebbings,and Brackmann [/ 959], 0 ; and as calculated by Burke, Taylor, and Ormonde [1967] , solid curve.…”
Section: Threshold Datamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…9 The results of Chamberlain, Smith, and Heddle are also normalized to theory near threshold in the manner given by Burke, Taylor, and Ormonde. 4 The sharp rise in the excitation cross section at threshold has been predicted by Damburg and Gailitis 2 from a close-coupling approximation calculation which includes the lowest three states of the H atom, i.e., the Is, 2s, and 2p states. Subsequent three-state close-coupling calculations by Taylor and Burke, 3 shown as TB (3state) in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…1(a), we give a comparison of our data with the earlier low-resolution experimental results of Chamberlain, Smith, and Heddle 5 and with two calculations on this system, both by Taylor and Burke. 4 In Fig. 1(b), the results of Taylor and Burke are shown as modified by folding into their correlation calculation our experimental electron energy distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R-matrix at r = a is determined from the E k , a ijk and the u ij 0 (r = a). The form of the wave function in the external region reduces to a close-coupling expansion without exchange: [6] The link between the internal and external regions (and therefore with the R-matrix) is provided by the requirement that the wave function and its derivative with respect to r must both be continuous at r = a. There are three features of the R-matrix method that have made it the method of choice for many researchers in electron-atom/molecule collisions.…”
Section: Back To England 1962-1967mentioning
confidence: 99%