2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.101.052802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy Al23β -delayed proton decay and Na22 destruction in novae

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By fitting unbroadened β-delayed γ-ray peaks with the EMG function Eq. (1) at energies of 451.7(5), 493.3 (7), 944.9(5), and 1612.4(5) keV ( 25 Si(βγ) 25 Al) [42] and 450.70 (15), 1599(2), 2908(3), and 7801(2) keV ( 23 Al(βγ) 23 Mg) [54] measured using the same detection setup in a subsequent experiment in the same campaign [55], the parameters τ and σ were characterized as a function of energy for each SeGA detector. Every detector has a different contribution to the total number of counts in the peak depending on its detection efficiency, and the simulation accounts for this by normalizing the number of counts simulated for each detector.…”
Section: Doppler Broadening Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By fitting unbroadened β-delayed γ-ray peaks with the EMG function Eq. (1) at energies of 451.7(5), 493.3 (7), 944.9(5), and 1612.4(5) keV ( 25 Si(βγ) 25 Al) [42] and 450.70 (15), 1599(2), 2908(3), and 7801(2) keV ( 23 Al(βγ) 23 Mg) [54] measured using the same detection setup in a subsequent experiment in the same campaign [55], the parameters τ and σ were characterized as a function of energy for each SeGA detector. Every detector has a different contribution to the total number of counts in the peak depending on its detection efficiency, and the simulation accounts for this by normalizing the number of counts simulated for each detector.…”
Section: Doppler Broadening Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The geometry of our experimental setup and the beam spatial distribution were used as inputs for a geant4 [45,46] Monte Carlo simulation to de-termine a γ-ray photopeak efficiency curve for the SeGA detectors. We verified the simulated efficiency curve by using a 152 Eu calibration source between 122 keV and 1408 keV and 23 Al data [55] up to 7801 keV. Although the 152 Eu source was absolutely calibrated, our procedure for determining the absolute intensities of the γ rays only requires relative efficiencies.…”
Section: Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This has been achieved using the same techniques applied to X-ray burst reactions for unstable nuclei (see above and e.g. [448,449,413,450,451,452,453]), and the same techniques applied to stellar-burning reactions (Section 2, e.g. [107]).…”
Section: How Did We Get Here?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gaseous Detector with Germanium Tagging (GADGET) at FRIB was designed to address these issues by depositing the beta decay parent into a gaseous TPC (which is nearly transparent to the beta particles) [31] and surrounding it with an array of high-purity germanium detectors (to detect particle-gamma coincidences from the population of excited final states [20]. GADGET has operated for several years in its first phase using a coarse-grained MPGD with 13 pads as a calorimeter to measure weak, low-energy (200-300 keV) proton branches, of relevance to nucleosynthesis in classical nova explosions [32,33]. In order to study a special case of multi-particle emission of relevance to Type I X-ray bursts on accreting neutron stars [34,35], GADGET has recently been upgraded to operate in its second phase as a TPC with a higher granularity MPGD with 1024 pads and GET electronics.…”
Section: The Gaseous Detector With Germanium Tagging (Gadget)mentioning
confidence: 99%