2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4901978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy photoelectron imaging of HS2 anion

Abstract: Low-energy photoelectron imaging of HS2 (-) has been investigated, which provides the vibrational frequencies of the ground state as well as the first excited state of HS2. It allows us to determine more accurate electron affinity of HS2, 1.9080 ± 0.0018 eV. Combined with Frank-Condon simulation, the vibrational features have been unveiled related to S-S stretching and S-S-H bending modes for the ground state and S-S stretching, S-S-H bending, and S-H stretching modes for the first excited state. Photoelectron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the DMBE-SEC method is employed to model the ab initio energies, the well depth of the global minimum is 0.0078E h lower than that of MRCI(Q)/AVQZ. As for the harmonic frequencies, the DMBE/SEC PES from the present work predicts values of 2714.19 cm −1 , 504.45 cm −1 , and 812.27 cm −1 , which are in good agreement with the most recent experimental values given by Qin et al, [7] which are 2585 ± 81 cm −1 , 490 ± 41 cm −1 , and 741 ± 41 cm −1 , respectively. The contour maps for the H( 2 S) + S 2 (a 1 ∆ g ) → SH(X 2 Π) + S( 3 P) reaction in internal coordinates at four H-S-S angles (∠HSS = 0 • , 45 .…”
Section: Features Of Potential Energy Surfacesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since the DMBE-SEC method is employed to model the ab initio energies, the well depth of the global minimum is 0.0078E h lower than that of MRCI(Q)/AVQZ. As for the harmonic frequencies, the DMBE/SEC PES from the present work predicts values of 2714.19 cm −1 , 504.45 cm −1 , and 812.27 cm −1 , which are in good agreement with the most recent experimental values given by Qin et al, [7] which are 2585 ± 81 cm −1 , 490 ± 41 cm −1 , and 741 ± 41 cm −1 , respectively. The contour maps for the H( 2 S) + S 2 (a 1 ∆ g ) → SH(X 2 Π) + S( 3 P) reaction in internal coordinates at four H-S-S angles (∠HSS = 0 • , 45 .…”
Section: Features Of Potential Energy Surfacesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Exp. [7] - present DMBE/SEC PES locates at R 1 = 3.937a 0 , R 2 = 2.540a 0 , and R 3 = 4.836a 0 (R 1 is the SS interatomic separation, while R 2 and R 3 are the two SH interatomic separations), differing only 0.025a 0 , 0.002a 0 , and 0.003a 0 from the MRCI(Q)/AVQZ results, respectively. Compared with the theoretical works of Peterson et al [17] and Denis, [16] the maximal differences occur in R 3 , which are only 0.043a 0 and 0.025a 0 , respectively.…”
Section: Features Of Potential Energy Surfacementioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More accurate information about the ground-state X 2 A″ has been determined experimentally by millimeter spectrum, microwave spectrum, and infrared spectrum . The A 2 A′ ← X 2 A″ transition has been recently re-investigated by several advanced techniques including high-resolution Fourier transform, photodetachment-photoelectron spectroscopy, and low-energy photoelectron imaging, from which the geometries and spectroscopic constants of both states have been obtained. Theoretically, X 2 A″ and A 2 A′ states have been extensively studied using various methods, such as self-consistent field (SCF), configuration interaction (CI), coupled-cluster singles and doubles model (CCSD), coupled cluster singles and doubles with perturbative triples (CCSD­(T)), and B3LYP methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%