2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2021)191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy probes of sterile neutrino transition magnetic moments

Abstract: Sterile neutrinos with keV-MeV masses and non-zero transition magnetic moments can be probed through low-energy nuclear or electron recoil measurements. Here we determine the sensitivities of current and future searches, showing how they can probe a previously unexplored parameter region. Future coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS) or elastic neutrino-electron scattering (EνES) experiments using a monochromatic 51Cr source can fully probe the region indicated by the recent XENON1T excess.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming instead the modified iron-filter QF the constraints are slightly tighter, µ ν e 1.1 × 10 −10 µ B for sterile neutrino masses below 100 keV, at for m 4 100 keV). They are competitive with the constraints implied by XENON1T data (indeed more constraining if one focuses only on the nuclear recoil channel) [69], are stronger than those derived from CENNS10 [28] and comparable (or even tighter) than those following from TEXONO depend- ing on the QF model used for the analysis, as can be read directly from the graphs. If compared with explanations of the XENON1T electron excess using electron neutrinos [28], one can see that our results are consistent with that possibility 4 , regardless of the QF choice.…”
Section: B Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Assuming instead the modified iron-filter QF the constraints are slightly tighter, µ ν e 1.1 × 10 −10 µ B for sterile neutrino masses below 100 keV, at for m 4 100 keV). They are competitive with the constraints implied by XENON1T data (indeed more constraining if one focuses only on the nuclear recoil channel) [69], are stronger than those derived from CENNS10 [28] and comparable (or even tighter) than those following from TEXONO depend- ing on the QF model used for the analysis, as can be read directly from the graphs. If compared with explanations of the XENON1T electron excess using electron neutrinos [28], one can see that our results are consistent with that possibility 4 , regardless of the QF choice.…”
Section: B Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…They are competitive with the constraints implied by XENON1T data (indeed more constraining if one focuses only on the nuclear recoil channel) [69], are stronger than those derived from CENNS10 [28] and comparable (or even tighter) than those following from TEXONO depend- ing on the QF model used for the analysis, as can be read directly from the graphs. If compared with explanations of the XENON1T electron excess using electron neutrinos [28], one can see that our results are consistent with that possibility 4 , regardless of the QF choice. Note that the sterile neutrino dipole portal and NGI results, in contrast to those found for the weak mixing angle, are to a large extent rather insensitive to the QF model.…”
Section: B Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coherent Elastic neutrino-Nucleus Scattering (CEνNS) is a Standard Model (SM) process that has attracted interest from the Physics community. CEνNS offers the possibility to perform high precision measurements in several processes of the SM [1][2][3][4] as well as exploring New Physics (NP) scenarios in nuclear and particle physics [5][6][7][8][9]. CEνNS was first observed by the COHERENT collaboration using a CsI[Na] crystal [10] and later with a LAr detector [11] in the Spallation source SNS at Oak Ridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35] initiated a broad study of the relevant parameter space for a dipole portal, and this was recently complemented by a thorough analysis of low-energy and cosmological phenomena [36]. Since these early studies, the viable parameter space for a neutrino dipole portal has received considerable attention [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53], and has persisted as a potential explanation of the MiniBooNE excess [40,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%