Low-energy scattering of muonic hydrogen on helium and lithium nuclei

Kravtsov, Andrey V.; Михайлов, А. И.; Popov, N.P.

doi:10.1088/0022-3700/19/9/014

Cited by 29 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the same time, our cross--sections significantly differ from the corresponding results of Ref. [30] obtained in the frame of the same method of calculation, i.e. one-level adiabatic approximation.…”

Section: Phase-function Methods For One-level Problemcontrasting

confidence: 96%

“…7 presents the comparison of the dominating s-wave cross-sections obtained in the present paper with the ones of Refs. [30] and [29]. Our results are close to the corresponding two-level in the one-level adiabatic approximation in the present paper (solid) and in Ref.…”

Section: Phase-function Methods For One-level Problemsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Our results are close to the corresponding two-level in the one-level adiabatic approximation in the present paper (solid) and in Ref. [30] (dashed) with the corresponding two-level s-wave cross-section of Ref. [29] (dotted line).…”

Section: Phase-function Methods For One-level Problemsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…cross-sections of Ref. [29] whereas they significantly differ from results of [30], especially for low-energy limit. We also have found a significant discrepancy between our s-wave elastic cross-sections and the corresponding ones of Ref.…”

Section: Phase-function Methods For One-level Problemmentioning

confidence: 57%

“…On the other hand, the corresponding one-level calculation for 2pσ state with and without inclusion of electron screening of a helium nucleus was performed in Ref. [30] in adiabatic approximation for s and p partial waves for all hydrogen and helium isotopes. However, the unscreened s-wave cross-sections for elastic (pµ) 1s + 3 He ++ scattering significantly differ from the corresponding ones obtained in the present paper using the same method of calculation and from the two-level results of Ref.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Elastic (hμ)_1s+ He⁺⁺Scattering and the Influence of Adiabatic Corrections on (Heμh)⁺⁺Bound States

2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-sections for elastic scattering of muonic hydrogen on helium nuclei, (hµ) 1s + He ++ , where h and He ++ stands for a hydrogen and a helium isotope nucleus, respectively, were calculated in the one-level adiabatic approximation for a range of collision energies from 0 to 50 eV. Bound states and energy levels of (hµHe) ++ molecular ions were also calculated and compared with their Born-Oppenheimer counterparts. It is shown that adiabatic corrections are responsible for proper positions of the RamsauerTownsend minima in (hµ)1s + He ++ elastic scattering and, at the same time, they significantly influence bound states and energy levels of (Heµh) ++ and (Heπh) ++ ions. Calculations were performed in the frame of the phase--function method.

show abstract

Section: Phase-function Methods For One-level Problemcontrasting

confidence: 96%

Section: Phase-function Methods For One-level Problemsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Phase-function Methods For One-level Problemsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Phase-function Methods For One-level Problemmentioning

confidence: 57%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations