“…Our results are depicted in fig.4 for the best fit LMA+SFP prediction with ∆m 2 21 = 8.2 × 10 −5 eV 2 , tan 2 θ = 0.31 (middle curve), for the set ∆m 2 21 = 8.4 × 10 −5 eV 2 , tan 2 θ = 0.27 (upper curve) and for the LMA best fit, ∆m 2 21 = 7.9 × 10 −5 eV 2 , tan 2 θ = 0.46 (lower curve). For the average source-detector distance of 180 km, as reported by KamLAND, we get from fig.4, P = 0.576 (LMA), 0.623 (Best fit SFP), 0.651 (Table 4 fit) (18) to be compared with the data, P = 0.658 ± 0.064 [23]. Interestingly enough it is seen that the best of the three fits lies in this case for the parameter choice as in table 4, namely the one leading to the Gallium data sets which lie the furthest apart: 74.7 and 60.5 SNU.…”