1995
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/273.3.549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-energy X-ray spectral variability of NGC 4051

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rapid and large-amplitude variability as seen in other NLS1s (Boller 2000) is not detected during our observation. For example, for the NLS1 NGC 4051, McHardy et al (1995) reported a flux variation by a factor of about 10 during a 28 ks ROSAT observation. However, as can be seen in the middle right panel of Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid and large-amplitude variability as seen in other NLS1s (Boller 2000) is not detected during our observation. For example, for the NLS1 NGC 4051, McHardy et al (1995) reported a flux variation by a factor of about 10 during a 28 ks ROSAT observation. However, as can be seen in the middle right panel of Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further observations, probably with Chandra, are required to investigate the putative À2340 km s À1 absorption system further. McHardy et al (1995) and Nicastro et al (1999) modeled ROSAT observations of NGC 4051 and claimed significant ionized X-ray absorption variability. Our observations, in contrast, fail to find any significant FUV absorption variability (though the limited temporal sampling might have caused a coincidence of observing on times when conditions were similar).…”
Section: Ultraviolet-x-ray Connectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…PCA response matrices were calculated individually for each observation using PCARSP V2.37, taking into account temporal variations of the detector gain and the changing number of detectors used. Fluxes in the 2-10 keV band were then determined using XSPEC, fitting a simple powerlaw with variable slope but with absorption fixed at the Galactic level of 1.3×10 20 cm −2 (Elvis, Lockman and Wilkes 1988;Stark et al 1992;M c Hardy et al 1995). The errors in the flux are scaled directly from the observed errors in the measured count rate.…”
Section: Rxtementioning
confidence: 99%