2018
DOI: 10.3397/1/376628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-frequency impact sound pressure fields in small rooms within lightweight timber buildings – suggestions for simplified measurement procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantities, however, are still too high and far from satisfactory in multi-occupancy residential buildings. In addition, the positive values of term CI, observed for both models, prove that low frequency performance may pose a challenging problem [25][26][27]. Local improvement of sound insulation was observed at 250 Hz for both investigated floors, with and without the ceiling, for both airborne and impact sound insulation characteristics (Figure 7).…”
Section: Heavy Floating Floorsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quantities, however, are still too high and far from satisfactory in multi-occupancy residential buildings. In addition, the positive values of term CI, observed for both models, prove that low frequency performance may pose a challenging problem [25][26][27]. Local improvement of sound insulation was observed at 250 Hz for both investigated floors, with and without the ceiling, for both airborne and impact sound insulation characteristics (Figure 7).…”
Section: Heavy Floating Floorsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The quantities, however, are still too high and far from satisfactory in multi-occupancy residential buildings. In addition, the positive values of term C I , observed for both models, prove that low frequency performance may pose a challenging problem [25][26][27]. Equally surprising is the fact that the significantly increased mass of the floor, resulting from the larger thickness of the upper slab in model 1d (60 mm), did not improve significantly the airborne sound insulation, compared to the considerably thinner screed used in model 1c (25 mm).…”
Section: Heavy Floating Floorsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This may also explain some other unexpected results, such as that the thinner simple floor (Model S1) was slightly better in the low-frequency range than the reference floor (but worse in higher frequency ranges). In order to obtain better statistical results, a number of excitation points that are sufficient to archive a certain standard error of the average results, similar to a proposed measurement procedure, 17 should be used. It should also be noted that damping is a property that may be a source of deviation from reality in these types of simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in order to use damping for a frequency interval like one-third octaves, it would be better to connect each measurement position to its specific composition of modes and its specific damping. This means that for each measurement position of impact sound, for instance, there should be a corresponding measurement of its decay time (like the measurements points proposed in Olsson and Linderholt [17]). The main challenge may now be in mediumsized to larger sized rooms in the lowest frequencies with high sound absorption.…”
Section: Low Frequency Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%