2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-frequency noise in gas sensors: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted three measurements on four different devices on three separate days. The error bars are a result of variations in device surface chemistry, contamination, dimensions, and noise originating from various factors as explained by Shin et al A typical gas sensing experiment showing the i–V curve shift due to exposure to different H 2 concentrations is presented in Figure S2; an example of the transient response is shown in Figure S3. The response, i 1 i 0 i 0 · 100 ( % ) , and Δ V TH , V TH1 – V TH0 (V), are presented, where the subscripts 0 and 1 denote the values before and following H 2 exposure.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted three measurements on four different devices on three separate days. The error bars are a result of variations in device surface chemistry, contamination, dimensions, and noise originating from various factors as explained by Shin et al A typical gas sensing experiment showing the i–V curve shift due to exposure to different H 2 concentrations is presented in Figure S2; an example of the transient response is shown in Figure S3. The response, i 1 i 0 i 0 · 100 ( % ) , and Δ V TH , V TH1 – V TH0 (V), are presented, where the subscripts 0 and 1 denote the values before and following H 2 exposure.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FES method proved its advantages in numerous experiments by detecting a few gases with a single gas sensor or detecting an adsorbed single gas molecule. These results were thoroughly reviewed elsewhere [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few percent was observed for the Cu doping of the LaFeO 3 sensor (CO 2 gas [ 23 ]). The doping shortened the response/recovery to a few hundred seconds; however, the FES method is still very attractive because we observe a change in noise power spectral intensities that can be as large as a few orders of magnitude at very low gas concentrations [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 5–13 ] AOSs have been commercialized and utilized in numerous fields, including disease monitoring and food spoilage detection. [ 6,7 ] Owing to the development of complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS)‐compatible gas sensors, such as GasFET, [ 14,15 ] capacitively coupled FET (CCFET), [ 16,17 ] and floating‐gate FET (FGFET), [ 18,19 ] AOSs integrated with a large‐scale gas sensor array with digital‐based interface circuits have been implemented. [ 20–22 ] The performance of AOS has been improved by applying a machine learning‐based gas identification algorithm using a large amount of gas sensor data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%