SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992 1992
DOI: 10.1190/1.1821971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐frequency propagation through fine layering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the two peaks really start merging when the interbed sediment thickness is less than 5 m, as we see in the Brugdan I downgoing wavefield (Figure 4b). This observation is partly in agreement with Folstad and Schoenberg (1992), who find that scaling layers up to λ∕10 of the smallest wavelength yields signals very close to the exact response with insignificant changes in the arrival time, wave shape, or apparent attenuation. Here, the dominant wavelength within the top basalt flow is approximately 100 and 50 m for interbed sediments.…”
Section: Stratigraphic Filtering Of Waveforms D269supporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, the two peaks really start merging when the interbed sediment thickness is less than 5 m, as we see in the Brugdan I downgoing wavefield (Figure 4b). This observation is partly in agreement with Folstad and Schoenberg (1992), who find that scaling layers up to λ∕10 of the smallest wavelength yields signals very close to the exact response with insignificant changes in the arrival time, wave shape, or apparent attenuation. Here, the dominant wavelength within the top basalt flow is approximately 100 and 50 m for interbed sediments.…”
Section: Stratigraphic Filtering Of Waveforms D269supporting
confidence: 79%
“…The logs are of good quality and allow the identification of many subaerially emplaced flows over much of the section. Figure 2 shows the P-and S-velocity and density logs after re-sampling the data to 3 m using a Backus average (Backus 1962;Folstad & Schoenberg 1992). There are wide variations in P-and S-velocities, in an asymmetric, quasi-periodic manner, though the mean velocities are very consistent over the well.…”
Section: Layer-induced Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known from geological and petrophysical studies (Gardiner, personal communication) that the porosity fluctuations between individual beds in this stack are not large and that the overall thickness, T, of the channel sand package is still small compared to the seismic wavelength, λ, such that λ/T < 5. It therefore follows that for the purposes of seismic wave propagation, the vertical heterogeneity arising from the internal thin layering in such a reservoir can be adequately replaced by a single saturated homogeneous layer representing the entire channel sand package, with no loss of accuracy (see for example Folstad and Schoenberg 1992). The elastic moduli κ eff sat and μ eff of this effective layer can be calculated by applying the theory of Backus (1962), who developed general averaging formulae for isotropic (or vertically transverse isotropic) layers.…”
Section: A P P E N D I Xmentioning
confidence: 99%