2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-frequency Versus High-frequency Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation on Postural Control and Gait in Parkinson's Disease: A Quantitative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
81
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All articles in which the two authors agreed on eligibility were included. There were five articles, all in persons with Parkinson disease, that used brain stimulation as an experimental maneuver to assess effects on gait variability (Hausdorff et al 2009, Fasano et al 2010, Thevathasan et al 2012, Kaski et al 2013, Vallabhajosula et al 2015). After discussion, these studies were felt to deserve a separate evaluation and discussion due to the unique pathology and gait characteristics of the disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All articles in which the two authors agreed on eligibility were included. There were five articles, all in persons with Parkinson disease, that used brain stimulation as an experimental maneuver to assess effects on gait variability (Hausdorff et al 2009, Fasano et al 2010, Thevathasan et al 2012, Kaski et al 2013, Vallabhajosula et al 2015). After discussion, these studies were felt to deserve a separate evaluation and discussion due to the unique pathology and gait characteristics of the disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, short pulse widths decrease the activation of surrounding fibers as a result of specific axon properties such as chronaxie. Recently, an increasing number of reports have explored the use of low-frequency stimulation (60-80 Hz) to improve axial symptoms including freezing of gait, postural control, dysarthria, swallowing function and also bradykinesia [50,[52][53][54][55]. However, these reports only addressed the short-term effects, and the initial promising results were limited either by the transient clinical benefits or worsening of appendicular symptoms [52,56].…”
Section: Stn Imaging and Target Selectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Vallabhajosula et al studied 19 PD patients with bilateral STN DBS without pre-defined FOG state [15]. UPDRS III scores, static and dynamic postural control using gait initiation and gait evaluations were assessed in three conditions at medication Off state: DBS Off, LFS (60 Hz), and HFS (>100 Hz).…”
Section: Lfs (60 Hz or Below) Versus Hfs (≥130 Hz Or >100 Hz) In Patimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies had TEED maintained [4, 5, 8, 9, 16], but others did not [6, 7, 1215]. Phibbs et al studied 20 PD patients who were at least 3 months after on bilateral STN DBS with changes in gait (7 with balance issues, 7 with FOG, 6 with festination) [12].…”
Section: Effect Of Teed On the Effect Of Lfs Versus Hfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation