2016
DOI: 10.5370/jeet.2016.11.3.707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Frequency Vibration Energy Harvester Using Stopper-Engaged Dynamic Magnifier for Increased Power and Wide Bandwidth

Abstract: -We present a piezoelectric energy harvester with stopper-engaged dynamic magnifier which is capable of significantly increasing the operating bandwidth and the energy (power) harvested from a broad range of low frequency vibrations (<30 Hz). It uses a mass-loaded polymer beam (primary spring-mass system) that works as a dynamic magnifier for another mass-loaded piezoelectric beam (secondary spring-mass system) clamped on primary mass, constituting a two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) system. Use of polymer (polyca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Umeda et al [23] earlier used a free-fall ball to collide a piezoelectric beam to harvest the low-frequency vibration energy. Halim et al [24] and Halim and Park [25][26] designed several kinds of low-frequency VEHs using stopper-engaged dynamic magnifier. Liu et al [27] proposed a stopper VEH to increase the energy conversion bandwidth by limiting the vibration amplitude through mechanical stoppers, while the power output was decreased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Umeda et al [23] earlier used a free-fall ball to collide a piezoelectric beam to harvest the low-frequency vibration energy. Halim et al [24] and Halim and Park [25][26] designed several kinds of low-frequency VEHs using stopper-engaged dynamic magnifier. Liu et al [27] proposed a stopper VEH to increase the energy conversion bandwidth by limiting the vibration amplitude through mechanical stoppers, while the power output was decreased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding a coupled linear dummy oscillator that is similarly driven to a tuned hardening-type nonlinear harvester improves upon the uncoupled case without introducing the drawbacks of the inspiring designs. Similar to the reverse system with a linear harvester and nonlinear dynamic magnifier as shown in Halim et al (2016), models suggest that the addition of a linear excited dynamic magnifier to a nonlinear harvester results in an increased peak kinetic energy of the primary oscillator, at a wider bandwidth and without the undesirable central valley observed in linear coupled systems. Analytical and numerical analysis will show that this coupled system can outperform the uncoupled case even when total system mass is held constant and does not require the significant added cost as in arrays where multiple energy harvesters are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In recent years, vibroimpact models were introduced to vibration energy harvesters to improve the harvesting efficiency. Halim et al (Halim and Park, 2014;Halim et al, 2016) presented piezoelectric-based energy harvesters with a stopper-engaged dynamic magnifier that can be able to increase the operating bandwidth. Gu (2011) designed a low-frequency VEH based on periodic impact motions for energy harvesting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%