Intramolecular electron transfer within proteins plays an essential role in biological energy transduction. Electron donor and acceptor cofactors are bound in the protein matrix at specific locations, and protein-cofactor interactions as well as protein conformational changes can markedly influence the electron transfer rates. To assess these effects, we have investigated charge recombination from the primary quinone acceptor to the special pair bacteriochlorophyll dimer in wild-type reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and four mutants with widely modified free energy gaps. After light-induced charge separation, the recombination kinetics were measured in the light-and dark-adapted forms of the protein from 10 to 300 K. The data were analyzed by using the spin-boson model, which allowed us to self-consistently determine the electronic coupling energy, the distribution of energy gaps, the spectral density of phonons, and the reorganization energy. The analysis revealed slow changes of the energy gap after charge separation. Interesting correlations of the control parameters governing electron transfer were found and related to structural and dynamic properties of the protein.T he bioenergetic pathways of living systems involve a multitude of electron transfer (ET) reactions. Within large protein-cofactor complexes, electrons tunnel between donor and acceptor sites over substantial distances (5-30 Å). In the weak coupling regime, the ET rate coefficient is obtained from perturbation theory as (1-4)where ប and V denote Planck's constant divided by 2 and the electronic coupling matrix element, respectively. The thermally averaged Franck-Condon factor, FC, represents the probability of forming a resonant complex between donor and acceptor. This quantity can be calculated in various ways, based on classical, semiclassical, or quantum-mechanical theories (4). In the celebrated classical Marcus theory (1),with Boltzmann's constant, k B , and absolute temperature, T. The free energy difference between the reactant and product states, , the nuclear reorganization energy, , and the electronic coupling, V, are the three system parameters that govern the ET rate. From these quantities, only the driving force, , is directly accessible to measurement, e.g., by delayed fluorescence (5), redox titration (6), or voltammetry (7). The other two parameters can be determined only indirectly from kinetic data and are difficult to disentangle in practice. The intrinsic flexibility of proteins adds an interesting dynamic aspect to the ET reaction. Proteins fluctuate thermally among many different conformations and respond to charge rearrangements with structural relaxations on time scales ranging from (below) picoseconds to (at least) seconds. These motions can strongly affect the ET parameters and hence the ET rates (8-10). For studying biological ET, the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) of the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides is a superb model system. This membrane-spanning, 120-kDa, protein-pigment complex consists...