2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10039-017-0297-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Grade-Infekt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnosis of low-grade infection is therefore much more difficult than that of acute infection. Microbiological and histological analyses of tissue samples collected from the nonunion area are the only appropriate way to differentiate between aseptic and septic nonunion caused by low-grade infection [ 18 , 19 ]. This is more critical since the treatment concepts and the surgical management of aseptic and septic nonunion are almost opposite: Reamed intramedullary exchange nailing as a single-step procedure is the treatment of choice for aseptic diaphyseal nonunion of the femur and is combined with a high rate of osseous union [ 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of low-grade infection is therefore much more difficult than that of acute infection. Microbiological and histological analyses of tissue samples collected from the nonunion area are the only appropriate way to differentiate between aseptic and septic nonunion caused by low-grade infection [ 18 , 19 ]. This is more critical since the treatment concepts and the surgical management of aseptic and septic nonunion are almost opposite: Reamed intramedullary exchange nailing as a single-step procedure is the treatment of choice for aseptic diaphyseal nonunion of the femur and is combined with a high rate of osseous union [ 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%