2008
DOI: 10.2514/1.28530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Heat-Load-Vane Profile Optimization, Part 1: Code Validation and Airfoil Redesign

Abstract: Historically, there has been a distinct difference between the design of turbomachinery airfoils for aerodynamic performance and that for durability. However, future aeroengine systems will require ever-increasing levels of turbine inlet temperature, causing the durability and reliability of components to be an ever-more-important design concern. As a result, the need to incorporate heat-transfer predictions into traditional aerodynamic design and optimization systems presents itself. The following is an effor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Johnson et al [22] used a 2D RANS solver in concert with a Genetic Algorithm to optimise the Nozzle Guide Vane Mid-Span geometry for minimal heat load. Compared to the baseline results, the peak LE heat transfer was reduced by 15% and the SS transition was moved 24% closer to the TE for the optimised geometry.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson et al [22] used a 2D RANS solver in concert with a Genetic Algorithm to optimise the Nozzle Guide Vane Mid-Span geometry for minimal heat load. Compared to the baseline results, the peak LE heat transfer was reduced by 15% and the SS transition was moved 24% closer to the TE for the optimised geometry.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%