Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence 2021
DOI: 10.5220/0010726700003063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-invasive Neurophysiological Evaluation of Human Emotional State on Teleworkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, several scientific works demonstrated the reliability of wearable devices, such as the Empatica E4, in collecting Electrodermal Activity (EDA) and Photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals [9][10][11][12]. As demonstrated by different previous works [4,10,[13][14][15], the EDA corresponds to a consistent biomarker of the stress level, while the PPG-derived parameters, such as the Heart Rate (HR) and the Heart Rate Variability (HRV), were significantly correlated to the mental workload and emotional state variations [16][17][18][19][20][21]. In particular, Ragot et al [19] successfully adopted the Empatica E4 wristband to measure physiological responses in an emotion recognition task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this context, several scientific works demonstrated the reliability of wearable devices, such as the Empatica E4, in collecting Electrodermal Activity (EDA) and Photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals [9][10][11][12]. As demonstrated by different previous works [4,10,[13][14][15], the EDA corresponds to a consistent biomarker of the stress level, while the PPG-derived parameters, such as the Heart Rate (HR) and the Heart Rate Variability (HRV), were significantly correlated to the mental workload and emotional state variations [16][17][18][19][20][21]. In particular, Ragot et al [19] successfully adopted the Empatica E4 wristband to measure physiological responses in an emotion recognition task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%