2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02889696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low latitude ionospheric effects near longitude 120°E during the great geomagnetic storm of july 2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this movement, the low latitude ionization may remain unchanged or even increase due to the supply from higher altitudes where the downward E×B drift squeezes the plasma in magnetic flux tubes down to lower altitudes. Liu et al (2002) used the Fejer and Scherliess (1997) empirical model of the equatorial zonal electric field driven by the AE index to calculate the vertical drift during the poststorm increase. The model did not predict any E×B drift on 17 and 18 July 2000.…”
Section: -18 July 2000mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this movement, the low latitude ionization may remain unchanged or even increase due to the supply from higher altitudes where the downward E×B drift squeezes the plasma in magnetic flux tubes down to lower altitudes. Liu et al (2002) used the Fejer and Scherliess (1997) empirical model of the equatorial zonal electric field driven by the AE index to calculate the vertical drift during the poststorm increase. The model did not predict any E×B drift on 17 and 18 July 2000.…”
Section: -18 July 2000mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ion drift data from ROCSAT used in their analysis indicated a slight upward drift, but this was not enough strong to be able explain the observed enhancement. Liu et al (2002Liu et al ( , 2004 reported a marked increase of foF2 in low latitude stations 2 days following the onset of the storm. This increase following the geomagnetic storm of 14-17 July 2000, which they discussed in their 2002 publication, was observed at the low latitude ionosonde stations of Chungli (13.8 • N magnetic latitude) and Wuhan (19.3 • N magnetic latitude), but not at Kokubunji (25.7 • N magnetic latitude).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have investigated storm time ionospheric responses theoretically and observationally (e.g. Lee et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2002Liu et al, , 2004Kutiev et al, 2005;Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2007Maruyama and Nakamura, 2007;Astafyeva, 2009a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have investigated storm time ionospheric responses theoretically and observationally (e.g. Lee et al 2004;Liu et al 2002Liu et al , 2004Kutiev et al 2005;Zhao et al 2005Zhao et al , 2007Maruyama and Nakamura 2007;Astafyeva 2009aAstafyeva , 2009b.…”
Section: ; Ramamentioning
confidence: 98%