2022
DOI: 10.3390/atmos13040518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Latitude Ionospheric Responses and Coupling to the February 2014 Multiphase Geomagnetic Storm from GNSS, Magnetometers, and Space Weather Data

Abstract: The ionospheric response and the associated mechanisms to geomagnetic storms are very complex, particularly during the February 2014 multiphase geomagnetic storm. In this paper, the low-latitude ionosphere responses and their coupling mechanisms, during the February 2014 multiphase geomagnetic storm, are investigated from ground-based magnetometers and global navigation satellite system (GNSS), and space weather data. The residual disturbances between the total electron content (TEC) of the International GNSS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anomalous ionospheric variations were observed from plasma content variability during the geomagnetic storms of 6 April and 29 May 2010 [1,2]. Several studies have investigated the ionospheric variations during storms at different latitudes from satellite data [3][4][5]. Seasonal variations and hemispheric ionospheric irregularities are also present during geomagnetic storms [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anomalous ionospheric variations were observed from plasma content variability during the geomagnetic storms of 6 April and 29 May 2010 [1,2]. Several studies have investigated the ionospheric variations during storms at different latitudes from satellite data [3][4][5]. Seasonal variations and hemispheric ionospheric irregularities are also present during geomagnetic storms [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During storms, solar wind/magnetosphere coupling leads to increased Joule heating. This results perturbations in the composition, temperature, density, and winds of the upper atmosphere [27][28][29] that influence aerospace systems and associated human technologies. Examples of activities directly impacted are radio wave propagation, sending signals between satellites and Earth, control of communication and navigation systems, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the complex processes that occur in the upper atmosphere during geomagnetic storms make accurate modeling difficult. Existing models can only provide monthly averages of actual variability, especially during periods of magnetic quiet [27]. Geomagnetic phenomena's complexity makes modeling hard during disturbed period complex, hence interest in studying response of Koudougou station' TEC data during disturbed periods in general and particularly during moderate geomagnetic storms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude and occurrence of positive/negative ionospheric disturbances due to geomagnetic storms depend on latitude, local time, and other factors, including solar variability (Buonsanto, 1999;N M Pedatella, 2009;A Calabia, 2021). The storm induced ionospheric disturbances are due to the effect of the prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) and disturbance dynamo electric fields (DDEFs) (Blanc & Richmond, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%