Low-level laser therapy and exercise for patients with shoulder disorders in physiotherapy practice (a systematic review protocol)

Abstract

BackgroundLow-level laser therapy is one of the adjunct treatments of choice with exercise therapy for shoulder rehabilitation in physiotherapy clinical practices. Although previous reviews have found little use of low-level laser therapy, there are recent trials whose findings are yet to be systematically reviewed.MethodsWe plan to do a systematic review to assess the effects of low-level laser therapy with exercise and exercise alone in participants who are 18 years and above, with a clinical or radiological diagnosis of various shoulder pathologies. We will search CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PEDro, Science Direct, Scopus and Physiotherapy Choices regardless of publication status. We will hand search for subject-specific journals (PhotoMedicine and Laser Surgery, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine and Journals of Lasers in Medical Science) and conference proceedings of World Association for Laser Therapy. Two review authors will independently screen, select studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias based on a priori criteria. Disagreements between review authors will be resolved either through discussion or consultation with a third review author. If there are at least two clinically homogeneous studies, we will perform meta-analysis.DiscussionThe findings will shed more light on the benefit of low-level laser therapy as an adjunct treatment to exercise in the management of shoulder disorders. The findings may also inform decision makers in the review and development of guidelines for shoulder rehabilitation in physiotherapy practices.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42014013691Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0050-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy in subacromial impingement syndrome: a three-month follow-up controlled clinical trial

“…[6][7][8] High-intensity laser therapy using neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser is an alternative technique which could serve to boost the analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and biostimulant effects of laser emission. 9 It has some advantages over low-level, particularly its greater tissue-penetration capacity owing to its high power and the lower absorption of 1064 nm wavelength by subcutaneous chromophores, 10 which make for a reduction in the high-intensity versus the low-level exposure time required to achieve treatment goals, 11 as well as recovery times when a power of more than 1 W is used. 12 In subacromial syndrome, studies with highintensity laser therapy have been limited to a series of cases, 13 or studies without a placebo-controlled group, 14,15 using short follow-up periods.…”

Evolution of the methodological quality of controlled clinical trials for myofascial trigger point treatments for the period 1978–2015: A systematic review

“…This may explain the high relative frequency of these treatment strategies. Physiotherapists frequently use electrophysical agent applications in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders, although only few of them have been proven to be effective so far (Robertson and Baker, 2001;Awotidebe et al, 2015).…”

Efficacy of tubing technique with biomaterials compared to direct coaptation technique after peripheral neurotmesis in nerve healing and return to functionality in young adult rats: a systematic review protocol

“…Statistical heterogeneity will be tested using Cochran's Q with a P value of < 0.10 considered statistically significant and I 2 statistic (0 to 40%: might not be important; 30 to 60%: may represent moderate heterogeneity; 50 to 90%: may represent substantial heterogeneity; 75 to 100%: considerable heterogeneity). We will try to explain the source of heterogeneity by subgroup analyses or sensitivity analyses [14,20] considering as potential covariates: sex of animals (male vs female) and risk of bias in individual studies (e.g., low/moderate vs high risk). Small study effects (or "publication bias" across studies) will be assessed by inspection of the funnel plots for asymmetry [19]and the Egger test [20], with the results considered to indicate potential small study effects when P values are < 0.10.…”