2018
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.18-24284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Level Nighttime Light Therapy for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract: Although acceptable to the patients, light therapy did not have a substantial effect on the progression of early AMD over 12 months. Further investigation is necessary to discover the permanency and cause of the adverse effect of light therapy on dark adaptation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As darkness is known to stimulate the secretion of melatonin from the pineal gland, our findings are in agreement with previous studies showing that increased melatonin synthesis could play a protective role in the pathophysiology of AMD 67 . However, a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) failed to show any beneficial effect of low-level night-time light therapy on the progression of AMD 68 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As darkness is known to stimulate the secretion of melatonin from the pineal gland, our findings are in agreement with previous studies showing that increased melatonin synthesis could play a protective role in the pathophysiology of AMD 67 . However, a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) failed to show any beneficial effect of low-level night-time light therapy on the progression of AMD 68 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimitrov et al [15,41] assessed using both techniques. Eight studies used an adapted Humphrey Visual Field Perimeter (HVFP; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA, USA) [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] and eight utilised an 'in-house' adaptometer, with methods developed by investigators [15,41,42,[61][62][63][64][65]. Other adaptometers, featured in more than one study, included the Medmont Dark Adapted Chromatic perimeter (MDAC; Medmont Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia) (5 out of 27 studies) [55][56][57][58][59] and the Macular Disease Detection MDD-2 Ò device (Health Research Science, LLC, Lighthouse Pt, FL, USA) (2 out of 27 studies) [53,54].…”
Section: Other Adaptometers and Photostress Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequently reported parameters of DA in studies that did not use the AdaptDx were RCB (10 out of 27 studies) [41, 42, 44-48, 60, 63, 65], cone absolute threshold (9 out of 27 studies) [41, 42, 44-48, 63, 65], cone time constant (8 out of 27 studies) [44][45][46][47][48][49][50]65] and RIT/ rod criterion time (7 out of 27 studies) [41,[55][56][57][58][59]63]. Other parameters in the reviewed papers included rod absolute threshold (5 out of 27 studies) [41,[46][47][48]63] and 'second slope' or rod slope (5 out of 27 studies) [42,[46][47][48]65], which refers to the second phase of rod recovery when threshold data are fitted with a model based on the physiological process of DA [7].…”
Section: Other Adaptometers and Photostress Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations