2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.94.055005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Level Saturation of Brillouin Backscattering due to Cavity Formation in High-Intensity Laser-Plasma Interaction

Abstract: Full particle-in-cell simulations of Brillouin backscattering in the high-intensity regime are presented. The final state of the strongly nonlinear evolution of the ion-acoustic wave packet consists of its collapse and the formation of a density cavity which is supported by large-amplitude localized electromagnetic fields. The cavitation manifests itself in large oscillations of the reflectivity which is terminated by a low-level saturation with strong kinetic effects. This newly discovered scenario demonstrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total electric field acting locally on the atoms might therefore differ substantially from the laser field in vacuum. Depending on laser parameters, the density fluctuations driven by the parametric processes attain values far above the thermal fluctuations, can be of the order of magnitude of the original plasma density and even attain the critical density value in the case of an originally undercritical density [29]. The field, density and possibly the temperature fluctuations concomitant with the creation of suprathermal electrons and ions may strongly affect the energy levels distribution and transitions probabilities in the perturbed plasma.…”
Section: Impact Of Laser-plasma Interaction On Distribution Of Electrmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The total electric field acting locally on the atoms might therefore differ substantially from the laser field in vacuum. Depending on laser parameters, the density fluctuations driven by the parametric processes attain values far above the thermal fluctuations, can be of the order of magnitude of the original plasma density and even attain the critical density value in the case of an originally undercritical density [29]. The field, density and possibly the temperature fluctuations concomitant with the creation of suprathermal electrons and ions may strongly affect the energy levels distribution and transitions probabilities in the perturbed plasma.…”
Section: Impact Of Laser-plasma Interaction On Distribution Of Electrmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…10 The preformed plasma profile and parameters required as an input for the PIC simulations were provided by the CHIC code [23]. The hydrodynamic simulations show little variation of the temperature across the profile; in any case, our previous experience with the PIC simulations indicates that the dominant parameter influencing the interaction physics is the maximum density [29]. Indeed, Fig.…”
Section: Impact Of Laser-plasma Interaction On Distribution Of Electrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5] In 1D simulations of SBBS, the inclusion of kinetic electrons has made a difference in the saturation of SBBS. 16,17 Rambo, Wilks, and Kruer undertook hybrid simulations (fluid electrons and particle-in-cell ions) of SBBS including ion-ion collisions in one spatial dimension. 18 They observed that collisions affect the ions resonant with the SBBS ion waves so as to inhibit the flattening of the ion velocity distribution function due to trapping and thermalize the ion wave energy and the hot ion tail into the bulk ion velocity distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensities above the incident intensities are possible as the backscattered pulse is bursty and can undergo amplification, i.e., it takes up energy from the still ongoing incident laser pulse. This phenomenon is known for both, SRS [60] and SBS [61][62][63] . As expected, as the electron temperature T e increases SRS decreases.…”
Section: Boundary Conditions and Their Possible Physical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%