2023
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00758-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Levels of RSV Testing Among Adults Hospitalized for Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in the United States

Abstract: Introduction Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI)-related hospitalizations in older adults. Without RSV-specific treatment for adults, testing is uncommon, leading to potential underestimation of RSV incidence in real-world data studies. This study aimed to quantify the frequency of RSV testing during LRTI-related hospitalizations of older adults to inform interpretation of incidence estimates. Methods Administ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The indicator for the circulation of RSV was defined as a weekly number of RSV-related hospitalization counts (ICD-10-GM codes: B97.4, J21.0, J12.1, J20.5, J21.9) in children < 2 years. RSV circulation in children has been selected in multiple other model-based studies [ 18 , 28 , 65 ] and is a common approach due to more frequent testing and hospitalization and higher sensitivity of diagnostic tests in children than in adults [ 20 , 66 ]. We included J21.9 (acute bronchiolitis, unspecified) because RSV is the leading cause of bronchiolitis in this age group, accounting for the majority of bronchiolitis hospitalizations [ 67 69 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indicator for the circulation of RSV was defined as a weekly number of RSV-related hospitalization counts (ICD-10-GM codes: B97.4, J21.0, J12.1, J20.5, J21.9) in children < 2 years. RSV circulation in children has been selected in multiple other model-based studies [ 18 , 28 , 65 ] and is a common approach due to more frequent testing and hospitalization and higher sensitivity of diagnostic tests in children than in adults [ 20 , 66 ]. We included J21.9 (acute bronchiolitis, unspecified) because RSV is the leading cause of bronchiolitis in this age group, accounting for the majority of bronchiolitis hospitalizations [ 67 69 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all the works that attempted to estimate the RSV disease burden in older adults reported several limitations. These are basically due to the processing data from studies performed with very different methods and protocols [ 107 ]; being based on the case definition of influenza-like illness [ 108 ]; lacking the necessary data to stratify by age group; being based on data mainly derived from academic, high-income, in-hospital settings [ 31 , 67 ]; and underestimating the presence of other factors, such as coinfections or complications [ 15 ]. To address these limitations, the WHO published a document with the essential guidelines to be followed in estimating the RSV disease burden [ 109 ], but robust evidence is lacking.…”
Section: Estimating Rsv Disease Burden In Older Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite evidence of considerable RSV-associated morbidity, mortality, and health care expenditure, the potential severity of RSV infection in adults has historically been underappreciated by public health professionals and clinicians . Surveillance for RSV-associated illness in adults has been hampered by infrequent clinical testing, as clinicians may choose not to test because of limited awareness of RSV as an important pathogen in adults and because an RSV diagnosis does not typically change patient management. Additionally, until recently, limited tools were available to prevent RSV infection, although this changed in 2023 when the first RSV vaccines for adults aged 60 years or older were approved and recommended in the US via the use of shared clinical decision-making, which takes into account the risks and benefits of RSV disease and vaccination, the clinician’s knowledge and experience, and the patient’s values and preferences …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%