Low (linear) teacher effect on student achievement in pre‐academic physics education

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of physics education on students' achievement in a large‐scale quantitative study of pre‐academic high school students throughout the Netherlands. Two aspects of teacher characteristics as perceived by their students are included: their “pleasantness” principally defined by their perceived friendliness and positive feedback and their “centeredness” principally defined by the perceived teacher centeredness in the lessons. Furthermore, this study includes four student aspects: their “general capability,” their “quantity of work,” their “quality of work,” and their “interest in the lessons.” Structural Equation Modeling is used in order to cluster the different variables defining the perceived pleasantness and the perceived centeredness of the teacher and the general capability, interest, and learning attitudes of the students. Furthermore, interrelations among these components and students' achievement are analyzed. Eventually, a very large effect of the students' general capability (61–72%) and a remarkably smaller effect of the remaining parameters (<3%) on achievement are detected. However, one should not yet conclude that teacher effect on high‐achieving‐students' achievement is consistently low. To the contrary, these results should be seen as an incentive to consider nonlinear effects, to vary ones viewpoint and to include more/other variables. In spite of the almost negligible correlation between the measured aspects of the physics teachers and achievement, the correlations between the teacher variables and the remaining student variables are quite significant. Both the perceived pleasantness and the centeredness of the teachers have a significant effect on the interest of their students. Furthermore, the pleasantness of the teacher correlates with the quality of the students' work and the centeredness of the teacher with their quantity of work. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 49: 465–488, 2012

Hope and anxiety in physics class: Exploring their motivational antecedents and influence on metacognition and performance

“…This sample is comparable to the samples from Bøe and Henriksen (2013), Abraham and Barker (2015a), Chow, Eccles, and Salmela-Aro (2012), Cottaar (2012), Goetz et al (2010Goetz et al ( , 2011Goetz et al ( , 2012, Nieswandt andShanahan (2008), andRozek, Hyde, Svoboda, Hulleman, andHarackiewicz (2015), for assessing senior secondary students from Australia, Canada, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United States. In many of these studies, adolescents were enrolled in a compulsory science subject based on the degree they were aspiring to.…”

“…The final score on a subject as indicator of academic performance was extensively used in previous research in science teaching (see Britner, 2008;Britner & Pajares, 2006;Cottaar, 2012;Glynn et al, 2007Glynn et al, , 2011Gungor et al, 2007;Sawtelle et al, 2012;.…”

Physics on the Go: A Mobile Computer-Based Physics Laboratory for Learning Forces and Motion

“…They are free to move around and surround the place as part of the experiment. Teachers are also able to scaffold students' interest in Physics as proven in the study by [31] by providing new exposure, encouragement and monitoring students during learning. Therefore, MCPL experiments made students more interested as they are good at doing experiments and gain understanding of the Physics concepts.…”

Three Decades of Educational Effectiveness Research in Belgium and the Netherlands: Key Studies, Main Research Topics and Findings

“…Lietaert et al (2015) also found positive effects of teacher involvement on academic engagement in Flanders. Cottaar (2012) found a positive effect of the pleasantness of secondary teachers on students' interest in physics. Den Brok and colleagues (2004Brok and colleagues ( , 2005Brok and colleagues ( , 2010 studied effects of teacher proximity (as perceived by their students) on their students' achievements, motivation and attitudes, and found positive effects on all type of outcomes.…”