2019
DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.46.35722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low litter cover, high light availability and rock cover favour the establishment of Ailanthus altissima in forests in southern Switzerland

Abstract: Future forest composition is uncertain in many areas due to climate change. The spread of non-native species adds to these uncertainties, particularly in forests recently colonised by novel tree species. To anticipate future forest composition, and thus the provision of ecosystem services, a thorough understanding of the factors influencing the establishment of non-native tree species is essential. We studied the presence and abundance of regeneration of Ailanthusaltissima (Mill.) Swingle in 89 plots on a regu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some rural populations also exist in forest gaps (e.g. Knüsel et al 2019;Lapin et al 2019;Wagner et al 2020), but these are usually less abundant in central Europe than urban populations. While there is little evidence of negative effects of Ailanthus on urban biodiversity, wild urban populations can be challenging due to the vigorous clonal growth and regeneration of the tree, necessitating increased efforts for maintaining green spaces, transportation corridors and built structures (Kowarik and Säumel 2007;Sladonia et al 2017), including ancient monuments in southern Europe (Celesti Grapow and Ricotta 2020;Trotta et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some rural populations also exist in forest gaps (e.g. Knüsel et al 2019;Lapin et al 2019;Wagner et al 2020), but these are usually less abundant in central Europe than urban populations. While there is little evidence of negative effects of Ailanthus on urban biodiversity, wild urban populations can be challenging due to the vigorous clonal growth and regeneration of the tree, necessitating increased efforts for maintaining green spaces, transportation corridors and built structures (Kowarik and Säumel 2007;Sladonia et al 2017), including ancient monuments in southern Europe (Celesti Grapow and Ricotta 2020;Trotta et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some A. altissima populations may exhibit greater shade-tolerance than once thought with evident growth under light conditions below typical of shade-intolerant species (Martin et al 2010;Knüsel et al 2017). In fact, the microsite conditions that favor A. altissima colonization of forests once dominated by Castanea sativa were the same for recently undisturbed forests or post-re forests (Knüsel et al 2019). Such a capacity has not been established for R. pseudoacacia.…”
Section: Impacts On Forest Productivity and Richness/diversity (Hypot...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also one of the most important drivers of plant species composition [24,29,30], as well as soil biota [21]. It is also crucial for regeneration of canopy species [31][32][33]. Usually minimum light availability for sapling survival is higher for pioneer tree species than mid-and late-successional tree species [25,34,35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value varies light availability under open sky by around 5%-10% [32,36,37].Despite numerous studies confirming light availability limitation by alien species, few studies compare their influence with functionally analogous native competitors. Most studies on invasive plants focused rather on conditions favoring their establishment than their impacts [33,38,39]. For that reason we aimed to assess how much leaf area index (LAI, m 2 of leaves m −2 stand area) determines light availability on the forest floor and whether alien, invasive trees contribute more to canopy foliage area (expressed by LAI) than native species, assuming similar contributions to stem quantity (expressed as basal area, BA, m 2 ha −1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%