2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.04.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low long-term efficacy and tolerability of add-on rufinamide in patients with Dravet syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations common to several previously published post-marketing observational studies of RFM in refractory epilepsy include short follow up times, variable or unspecified time points for efficacy assessment, small sample sizes, populations restricted to one epilepsy type, and the retrospective use of the 50% responder rate outcome measure (Dahlin and Ohman, 2012; Joseph et al, 2011; Kim et al, 2013, 2012; Kluger et al, 2009; Mueller et al, 2011; Olson et al, 2011; Thome-Souza et al, 2014; Vendrame et al, 2010). Particularly in studies reporting efficacy at short assessment times, “honeymoon periods” may not be distinguishable from sustained efficacy, which limits the impact of those studies on clinical decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Limitations common to several previously published post-marketing observational studies of RFM in refractory epilepsy include short follow up times, variable or unspecified time points for efficacy assessment, small sample sizes, populations restricted to one epilepsy type, and the retrospective use of the 50% responder rate outcome measure (Dahlin and Ohman, 2012; Joseph et al, 2011; Kim et al, 2013, 2012; Kluger et al, 2009; Mueller et al, 2011; Olson et al, 2011; Thome-Souza et al, 2014; Vendrame et al, 2010). Particularly in studies reporting efficacy at short assessment times, “honeymoon periods” may not be distinguishable from sustained efficacy, which limits the impact of those studies on clinical decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, a number of studies have investigated the efficacy of RFM in children with other epilepsy types as well, including epileptic spasms and refractory epilepsy more generally (Coppola et al, 2014, 2013, 2011, 2010; Grosso et al, 2014; Joseph et al, 2011; Kim et al, 2013, 2012; Kluger et al, 2010a; Mueller et al, 2011a,b; Olson et al, 2011; Thome-Souza et al, 2014). In addition, RFM now has an indication for adjunctive therapy in refractory partial seizures in adults and adolescents (Brodie et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few pediatric studies have assessed the efficacy and safety/tolerability of RUF in childhood-onset EE and in epileptic syndromes other than Lennox-Gastaut syndrome [17,18,19,20,21]. We observed RUF to be more effective on focal-onset seizures compared to infantile spasms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…La mayoría de casos diagnosticados de forma tardía han recibido antiepilépticos como la carbamacepina, la oxcarbacepina, la lamotrigina o la vigabatrina, que empeoran la epilepsia en los pacientes del espectro Dravet 19,20 . Recientemente se ha encontrado también un empeoramiento de la epilepsia en el 30% de niños tratados con rufinamida 21 . También tiene efectos secundarios más severos la fenitoína 22 y es conveniente evitar los barbitúricos a dosis elevadas, dos fármacos que con frecuencia se utilizan los intensivistas en casos de estatus epiléptico 23 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified