1998
DOI: 10.1086/311556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Metallicity Inhibition of Type Ia Supernovae and Galactic and Cosmic Chemical Evolution

Abstract: We introduce a metallicity dependence of Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) rate into the Galactic and cosmic chemical evolution models. In our SN Ia progenitor scenario, the accreting white dwarf (WD) blows a strong wind to reach the Chandrasekhar mass limit. If the iron abundance of the progenitors is as low as [Fe/H] < ∼ − 1, then the wind is too weak for SNe Ia to occur. Our model successfully reproduces the observed chemical evolution in the solar neighborhood. We make the following predictions which can test this… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
304
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
304
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The progenitor model of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) is very important for predicting [α/Fe] of galaxies because SNe Ia produce more iron than α elements (O, Mg, Si, S, and Ca). Our SN Ia model is based on the single degenerate scenario with the metallicity effects of white dwarf winds (Kobayashi et al 1998(Kobayashi et al , 2000, and the lifetime distribution functions are calculated as in Kobayashi & Nomoto (2009). These provide an excellent agreement with the observed elemental abundances in the solar neighbourhood (Kobayashi & Nakasato 2011).…”
Section: Stellar Physicsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The progenitor model of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) is very important for predicting [α/Fe] of galaxies because SNe Ia produce more iron than α elements (O, Mg, Si, S, and Ca). Our SN Ia model is based on the single degenerate scenario with the metallicity effects of white dwarf winds (Kobayashi et al 1998(Kobayashi et al , 2000, and the lifetime distribution functions are calculated as in Kobayashi & Nomoto (2009). These provide an excellent agreement with the observed elemental abundances in the solar neighbourhood (Kobayashi & Nakasato 2011).…”
Section: Stellar Physicsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We will mainly discuss the models of K11 (Kobayashi et al 2011b) and its updated version, K15. Their main features include slow infall, no outflow, star formation proportional to gas fraction, the Kroupa (2001) initial mass function (IMF) at 0.01-50 M e , and the SN Ia model based on the single-degenerate scenario (Kobayashi & Nomoto 2009) with the metallicity effect (Kobayashi et al 1998). The metallicity-dependent nucleosynthesis yields are taken from Kobayashi et al (2006, hereafter K06) and Kobayashi et al (2011b) for SNe and hypernovae (with a 0.5 fraction of hypernovae at 20 M e ), and from Karakas (2010) for AGB stars.…”
Section: Comparison With the Galactic Chemical Evolution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From [Fe/H] ∼ −1, [C/Fe] decreases due to the delayed enrichment of SNe Ia. Although the lifetimes of these AGB stars (0.15-0.2 Gyr) are comparable to the shortest lifetimes of SNe Ia, the SN Ia contribution appears after the AGB contribution because of the metallicity dependence of the SN Ia lifetimes (Kobayashi et al 1998;Kobayashi & Nomoto 2009). These trends are characteristic of K11 and K15 models and are in excellent agreement with our observational data at [Fe/H]  −1.5.…”
Section: Comparison With the Galactic Chemical Evolution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, models of yields do not always agree with observations because of the scarse knowledge of certain processes in stellar evolution but also because the production of elements in supernovae explosions are highly sensitive to explosion parameters Kobayashi & Nakasato 2011). Another factor is that the presence of any dependence with the metallicity of the SNIa progenitors or the rate of occurrence of SNIa are unclear (Kobayashi et al 1998). In addition, chemodynamical models for certain elements do not always agree with observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%