2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-metallicity massive single stars with rotation

Abstract: Context. Metal-poor massive stars are assumed to be progenitors of certain supernovae, gamma-ray bursts, and compact object mergers that might contribute to the early epochs of the Universe with their strong ionizing radiation. However, this assumption remains mainly theoretical because individual spectroscopic observations of such objects have rarely been carried out below the metallicity of the Small Magellanic Cloud. Aims. Here we explore the predictions of the state-of-the-art theories of stellar evolution… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our spectroscopic sequences at Z = 1/30 Z most of the O2 stars are dwarfs. Kubátová et al (2019) calculated theoretical spectra of metal-poor stars (Z = 1/50 Z ) following quasi chemically homogeneous evolution. This type of evolution is different from the one followed in our computations, because it requires that rotational mixing be taken into account.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Sequences At Z = 1/30 Zmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our spectroscopic sequences at Z = 1/30 Z most of the O2 stars are dwarfs. Kubátová et al (2019) calculated theoretical spectra of metal-poor stars (Z = 1/50 Z ) following quasi chemically homogeneous evolution. This type of evolution is different from the one followed in our computations, because it requires that rotational mixing be taken into account.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Sequences At Z = 1/30 Zmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of evolution is different from the one followed in our computations, because it requires that rotational mixing be taken into account. However, the ZAMS models of Kubátová et al (2019) 2019) prefer <O4III. We therefore agree on the spectral type but find a different luminosity class.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Sequences At Z = 1/30 Zmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yet despite commensurate advances in stellar modeling, including state-of-the-art treatments of atmospheres, binarity, and rotation (e.g. Szécsi et al 2015;Götberg et al 2017;Eldridge et al 2017;Götberg et al 2018;Stanway & Eldridge 2019;Kubátová et al 2019), there is as-yet no clear solution to the apparent modeling deficit of hard ionizing photons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%