2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low molecular weight heparins: Structural differentiation by spectroscopic and multivariate approaches

Abstract: a b s t r a c tVarious branded low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have been used for the treatment and prevention of thrombotic for over 20 years. With the introduction of generic LMWHs and the recent events involving heparin contamination, a great deal of effort is being expended in investigating ways of monitoring and regulating this class of complex drugs. In this paper, we present the characterization of different forms of LMWHs, as well as the comparison of 5 enoxaparin copies from different manufactur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crowther et al have provided good evidence that this favorable matching of ligands of opposite charge sign is integral to the ability of PS to fully neutralize the anti-FXa activity of UFH. In particular, they and others have shown that the methods used to prepare LMWHs serve to decrease the average number of sulfate/sulfonate groups per disaccharide unit (for example, enoxaparin, which is prepared by benzylation of UFH followed by alkaline depolymerization, carries on average 2.6 sulfate/sulfonate groups per disaccharide). More significantly, those processing methods also increase the variability in the charge density of the polysaccharide chains, with Crowther et al reporting a low MW component of LMWH having a charge density ca.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crowther et al have provided good evidence that this favorable matching of ligands of opposite charge sign is integral to the ability of PS to fully neutralize the anti-FXa activity of UFH. In particular, they and others have shown that the methods used to prepare LMWHs serve to decrease the average number of sulfate/sulfonate groups per disaccharide unit (for example, enoxaparin, which is prepared by benzylation of UFH followed by alkaline depolymerization, carries on average 2.6 sulfate/sulfonate groups per disaccharide). More significantly, those processing methods also increase the variability in the charge density of the polysaccharide chains, with Crowther et al reporting a low MW component of LMWH having a charge density ca.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a, Percent substitution values were obtained by integration of HSQC spectra as described by Lima et al, 2011a. UFH, unfractionated heparins; LMWHs, low molecular weight heparins; A NS , 2‐deoxy‐2‐sulfoamino‐ D ‐glucopyranose; I 2S , 2‐ O ‐sulfo‐iduronic acid; G, glucuronic acid; A 3S , 2‐deoxy‐3‐ O ‐sulfo‐2‐amino‐ D ‐glucopyranose; A Nac , 2‐deoxy‐2‐acetylamino‐ D ‐glucopyranose; αred, terminal reducing residue with a configuration; 1,6‐an.A, 2‐amino‐1,6‐anhydro‐2‐deoxy‐b‐ D ‐glucopyranose; 1,6‐an.M, 2‐amino‐1,6‐anhydro‐2‐deoxy‐b‐ D ‐mannopyranose; M NS , 2‐deoxy‐2‐ sulfamino‐ D ‐mannopyranose; ΔU 2S , 2‐ O ‐sulfo‐4‐deoxy‐a‐ L ‐threo‐hex‐4‐enopyranosil uronic acid;U, Δ4‐deoxy‐a‐ L ‐threo‐hex‐4‐enopyranosil uronic acid. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partially and non‐specifically desulfated heparin was obtained by solvolytic desulfation by DMSO of the heparin pyridium salt [Nagasawa et al, 1979]. The amount of sulfate in heparin was determined by 2D Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and other chemical measurements as previously described [Dodgson and Price, 1962; Nader and Dietrich, 1977; Lima et al, 2011a]. Molecular weight was determined by gel permeation chromatography using a HPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with the outlet of the joint columns (TSK G3000SW and TSK G2000SW, TosoHaas, Tokyo, Japan) attached to an UV detector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, although FDP is sometimes referred to as an “ultra” LMWH, it has a distinct chemical structure and should also not be considered interchangeable with LMWHs [ 73 ]. Several CPGs recommended LMWH as the preferred anticoagulant class over alternative medications (e.g., LMWHs are favored over UFHs because their pharmacokinetic profile is more predictable, they have improved bioavailability, and are easier to use [ 73 , 74 ]); however, broad generalizations such as these provide somewhat limited guidance as specific LMWHs may in fact be more preferable to others in specific situations. Owing to this scarcity of evidence, further studies should be conducted to establish the comparative efficacy and safety of specific LMWHs against each other and FDP across clinical scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%