2010
DOI: 10.1128/aem.03085-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Pore Connectivity Increases Bacterial Diversity in Soil

Abstract: One of soil microbiology's most intriguing puzzles is how so many different bacterial species can coexist in small volumes of soil when competition theory predicts that less competitive species should decline and eventually disappear. We provide evidence supporting the theory that low pore connectivity caused by low water potential (and therefore low water content) increases the diversity of a complex bacterial community in soil. We altered the pore connectivity of a soil by decreasing water potential and incr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
190
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
12
190
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3b) correlated with the relative abundances of the dominant bacterial phyla (class) including the Acidobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Alphaproteobacteria. These results partially support the notion that soil texture is the strongest factor in structuring bacterial communities (Bach et al 2010;Carson et al 2010). Our study suggests that the soil texture fraction is the principal factor that plays an important role in determining soil nutrient status and moisture (Davinic et al 2012;Li et al 2014) and contributes to the differences in soil bacterial composition between conservation (chisel plow and zero tillage) and convention (plow) tillage.…”
Section: Effects Of Different Tillage Protocols On Soil Bacterial Taxsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3b) correlated with the relative abundances of the dominant bacterial phyla (class) including the Acidobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Alphaproteobacteria. These results partially support the notion that soil texture is the strongest factor in structuring bacterial communities (Bach et al 2010;Carson et al 2010). Our study suggests that the soil texture fraction is the principal factor that plays an important role in determining soil nutrient status and moisture (Davinic et al 2012;Li et al 2014) and contributes to the differences in soil bacterial composition between conservation (chisel plow and zero tillage) and convention (plow) tillage.…”
Section: Effects Of Different Tillage Protocols On Soil Bacterial Taxsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This observation can be explained by similarities in the soil texture and moisture between the zero and chisel plow tillage. The soil texture and moisture are principle factors affecting soil pore connectivity, which leads to changes in bacterial diversity, and are significantly related to the Shannon (P = 0.03) and Simpson (P = 0.01) indices (Carson et al 2010). The zero tillage, which caused less soil disturbance than the chisel plow tillage did, could provide a suitable environment for multiplying soil bacteria.…”
Section: Tillage Treatment Contributes To Differences In Soil Charactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…protozoan predation) in finetextured soils than in coarse-textured soils (Rutherford & Juma 1992). Recent results show that low pore connectivity may even contribute to high bacterial diversity in soil (Carson et al 2010).…”
Section: Eurogeomars 2009 Campaign: Astrobiology and Habitability Stumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near edge X-ray fine structure spectroscopy and scanning transmission X-ray microscopy have potential to provide new opportunities for three-dimensional investigation of molecules in soil (Schmidt et al, 2011). There are also opportunities for clarification of "recalcitrant" vs "protected" organic matter (Dungait et al, 2012b), and for identifying the roles of different microbial communities in connected and disconnected soil pores (Carson et al, 2010).…”
Section: Examples Of Sources Of Nutrients From Organic Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%