2014 22nd Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iraniancee.2014.6999498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-power and high-performance 5:2 compressors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it has the lowest power dissipation and PDP, achieving 35.6–64.9% and 48.1–78.8% improvement, respectively. Regarding delay, it is 1.8% slower than [7] and 4.8–46.3% faster than [3–6, 8]. The post‐layout results for our circuit add an overhead of 32.8% in power and 38.5% in delay, compared to pre‐layout simulation.…”
Section: Comparative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, it has the lowest power dissipation and PDP, achieving 35.6–64.9% and 48.1–78.8% improvement, respectively. Regarding delay, it is 1.8% slower than [7] and 4.8–46.3% faster than [3–6, 8]. The post‐layout results for our circuit add an overhead of 32.8% in power and 38.5% in delay, compared to pre‐layout simulation.…”
Section: Comparative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…According to Table 1, the proposed 5‐2 compressor has the lowest transistor count, achieving 23.6–38.3% improvement compared to [3–8]. Furthermore, it has the lowest power dissipation and PDP, achieving 35.6–64.9% and 48.1–78.8% improvement, respectively.…”
Section: Comparative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations