2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.112139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low processing temperatures explored in Sb2S3 solar cells by close-spaced sublimation and analysis of bulk and interface related defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be obviously seen that the (020), (120), ( 220), ( 130), (310), ( 021), ( 230), (211), and (221) diffraction peaks are existed in the five types of Sb 2 S 3 samples, which suggests the formation of high-crystallinity Sb 2 S 3 films. [36][37][38] Surprisingly, the diffraction intensities order of (120) and (211) peaks in Sb 2 S 3 -control, Sb 2 S 3 -0.1, Sb 2 S 3 -0.2, Sb 2 S 3 -0.3, and Sb 2 S 3 -0.4 films are Sb 2 S 3 -0.4 > Sb 2 S 3 -0.3 % Sb 2 S 3 -0.2 % Sb 2 S 3 -0.1 > Sb 2 S 3 -control (Figure 3b). This reveals that hydrothermal sulfuration could enhance the crystallinity at a mild heating temperature (160 °C), and the sulfuration effect is related to the volume of the (NH 4 ) 2 S. Furthermore, the SEM results demonstrate that the grain size of Sb 2 S 3 film did not change after hydrothermal sulfuration (Figure 2a-e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be obviously seen that the (020), (120), ( 220), ( 130), (310), ( 021), ( 230), (211), and (221) diffraction peaks are existed in the five types of Sb 2 S 3 samples, which suggests the formation of high-crystallinity Sb 2 S 3 films. [36][37][38] Surprisingly, the diffraction intensities order of (120) and (211) peaks in Sb 2 S 3 -control, Sb 2 S 3 -0.1, Sb 2 S 3 -0.2, Sb 2 S 3 -0.3, and Sb 2 S 3 -0.4 films are Sb 2 S 3 -0.4 > Sb 2 S 3 -0.3 % Sb 2 S 3 -0.2 % Sb 2 S 3 -0.1 > Sb 2 S 3 -control (Figure 3b). This reveals that hydrothermal sulfuration could enhance the crystallinity at a mild heating temperature (160 °C), and the sulfuration effect is related to the volume of the (NH 4 ) 2 S. Furthermore, the SEM results demonstrate that the grain size of Sb 2 S 3 film did not change after hydrothermal sulfuration (Figure 2a-e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 Recently, Krautmann et al have reported a similar variation of room temperature PL analysis of the synthesized Sb 2 S 3 lms by close-spaced sublimation, where they found two PL peaks located at 1.72 eV and 1.40 eV. 68 Meanwhile, Aslan et al performed PL analysis for dip-coating Sb 2 S 3 lms photodetector. Therein the authors have found three PL emissions peaks located at 400, 521, and 652.5 nm.…”
Section: Photoluminescence Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The single-phase structure and relatively low melting point at 611 °C have enabled the deposition of Sb 2 Se 3 by physical vapor techniques, such as magnetron sputtering (Tang et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2022), close-spaced sublimation (CSS) (Hobson et al, 2020;Spalatu et al, 2021) and vapor transport deposition (VTD) (Wen et al, 2018). To date, almost all the record PCEs for Sb 2 Se 3 PV devices, including the record 9.2% , have been achieved with CSS and VTD fabrication techniques (Krautmann et al, 2023). Since Sb 2 Se 3 is composed of quasi-one-dimensional ribbons, the charge transfer across the absorber film is strongly dependent on which crystal direction the Sb 2 Se 3 ribbons align (Chen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%