2008
DOI: 10.1137/050644677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Rank Approximation of Generic $p \timesq \times2$ Arrays and Diverging Components in the Candecomp/Parafac Model

Abstract: Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proven that in some cases cost function (18) (or any other measure of the difference between and its approximation) only has an infimum, and not a minimum [23], [41], [51], [60], [61]. However, this did not seem to pose major problems in our simulations.…”
Section: Computation: General Casecontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…It has been proven that in some cases cost function (18) (or any other measure of the difference between and its approximation) only has an infimum, and not a minimum [23], [41], [51], [60], [61]. However, this did not seem to pose major problems in our simulations.…”
Section: Computation: General Casecontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Nonexistence of a best rank-2 approximation of Z ∈ R I×J×K holds on a set of positive volume [14]. Nonexistence of a best rank-R approximation holds on a set of positive volume or even almost everywhere for certain classes of Z ∈ R I×J×2 [23,24]. Note that a best rank-1 approximation always exists, since S 1 (I, J, K) is closed [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For S R (I, J, 2) and R ≤ min(I, J) this can be done via the Generalized Schur Decomposition (GSD) [25,26]. Results on the existence of best rank-R approximations for generic Z ∈ R I×J×2 can be found in [23,24]. For S 2 (I, J, K) the boundary points are described in [14] and an algorithm is developed in [27] by means of finding a best rank-(2,2,2) approximation with several zero restrictions on the 2 × 2 × 2 core tensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reviewed extensively in Stegeman and Comon (2010), there has already been an extensive literature on this problem and related topics, and several psychometricians have partly contributed to them (e.g., Krijnen, Dijkstra, & Stegeman, 2008;Kruskal, 1989;Stegeman, 2006Stegeman, , 2007Stegeman, , 2008Stegeman & Lathauwer, 2009;Ten Berge & Kiers, 1999;Ten Berge, Kiers, & De Leeuw, 1988;Ten Berge, Sidiropoulos, & Rocci, 2004).…”
Section: Approx(a R): Given An Order-k Tensormentioning
confidence: 99%