2019
DOI: 10.2528/pierm19053006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low RCS Multi-Bit Coding Metasurface Modeling and Optimization: Mom-Gec Method in Conjunction With Genetic Algorithm

Abstract: We propose a new approach to design multi-bit coding metasurfaces (MSs) for broadband terahertz scattering reduction. An anisotropic graphene-based element with multiple reflection phase responses is modeled using the Method of Moments combined with the Generalized Equivalent Circuit's approach (MoM-GEC). The multi-level reflection phase response is adjusted by tuning the graphene chemical potential of each cell. Based on the coding metamaterials concept, 1-bit MS building blocks are nominated as "0" and "1" e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ERIC-PCR amplification of E. coli specifically has been shown to turn up a range of band sizes with reports of 170 to about 4000 bp, 232 to 2690 bp, 380 to 3280 bp and 300 bp to 4500 bp (Soltani et al, 2012;Ranjbar et al, 2017;Ramakrishna et al, 2022). Though these studies differed in their source of isolates, the variations did not appear to be species based.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERIC-PCR amplification of E. coli specifically has been shown to turn up a range of band sizes with reports of 170 to about 4000 bp, 232 to 2690 bp, 380 to 3280 bp and 300 bp to 4500 bp (Soltani et al, 2012;Ranjbar et al, 2017;Ramakrishna et al, 2022). Though these studies differed in their source of isolates, the variations did not appear to be species based.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed topology presents a structure with a uniform partitioned distribution, flexible and redundant for the scope of service continuity and aims also to solve the problem of the high inrush currents of the ac/dc switching power supplies of LED luminaires. It requires to provide multiple supplying sources and to adopt different technological systems [12,13], in particular, allowing a digital, an analogic and a manual ON/OFF control. Therefore, the modular distribution is configured with a main AC distribution and a branch DC distribution that connects clusters of luminaires as double-dual corded equipment, with double power supply and double control type, digital and analogic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lighting system is equipped with an integrated control, regulation, supervision and monitoring system that is with 4 subsystems:-ON/OFF control system; -Regulation system; - Supervision system; -Monitoring system. The following communication standards are used (Figure 9): -Konnex as the main BUS; -DALI for controlling the LEDs adjustable via the LED dimmer device; -0-10V as a redundant analogue system for controlling the LEDs adjustable via LED dimmer device; -Modbus for the supervision part of the electrical switchboards; -TCP / IP for high level integration [12,13].…”
Section: B) Command Regulation Supervision and Monitoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application field: Electromagnetics 159 Li, Chen, Zeng, et al [368] 2017 Adaptive GA optimization framework 160 Zhang and Cuii [369] 2017 BPSO optimization framework 161 Ahmed, Chandra, and Al-Behadili [370] 2017 GA Inverse design 162 Han, Cao, Gao, et al [371] 2017 GA optimization framework 163 Pfeiffer and Tomasic [372] 2017 GA optimization framework 164 Pelluri and Appasani [373] 2017 GA optimization framework 165 Feng, Chen, and Huang [374] 2017 GA optimization framework 166 Allen, Dykes, Reid, et al [375] 2017 GA optimization framework 167 Ding, Zhang, Zhang, et al [376] 2017 GA optimization framework 168 Mahdi and Taha [377] 2017 GA Topology optimization 169 Su, Lu, and Li [378] 2017 PSO optimization framework 170 Orlandi [379] 2018 Differential evolution optimization framework (DE) algorithm 171 Bagmancı, Karaaslan, Altıntaş, et al [380] 2018 GA optimization framework 172 Lim, Song, Kim, et al [381] 2018 GA optimization framework 173 Corrêa, Resende, Bicalho, et al [382] 2018 GA optimization framework 174 Kumar, Behera, and Suraj [383] 2018 GA optimization framework 175 Clemens, Iskander, Yun, et al [189] 2018 Hybrid genetic programming optimization framework 176 Soltani, Soltani, and Aguili [384] 2019 GA Inverse design 177 Ibili, Karaosmanoglu, and Ergul [385] 2019 GA optimization framework 178 Seshadri and Gupta [386] 2019 GA optimization framework 179 Nanda, De, Sahu, et al [387] 2019 GA optimization framework 180 Assal, Benzerga, Sharaiha, et al [388] 2019 GA optimization framework 181 Karatzidis, Kantartzis, Pyrialakos, et al [389] 2019 GA optimization framework 182 Tian and Li [390] 2019 GA optimization framework 183 Yuan, Ma, Sui, et al [391] 2019 GA Topology optimization 184 Yanzhang and Jinghao [392] 2019 GA Topology optimization 185 Sui, Ma, Chang, et al [393] 2019 IAGA optimization framework 186 Steckiewicz and Choroszucho [394] 2019 PSO optimization framework 187 Hao, Du, and Zhang …”
Section: Continuation Of Tablementioning
confidence: 99%